RFR: 8373116: Genshen: arraycopy_work should be done unconditionally by arraycopy_marking if the array is in an old region [v5]
William Kemper
wkemper at openjdk.org
Sat Dec 6 00:52:01 UTC 2025
On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 18:19:39 GMT, Xiaolong Peng <xpeng at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Chasing the root cause of JDK-8372498, I have narrowed down root cause to the commit https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/f8cf9ca69cfef286c80559bfe1d147b6303d10d2
>>
>> It is caused by the behavior change from follow code:
>>
>> Original:
>>
>> if (ShenandoahSATBBarrier) {
>> T* array = dst;
>> HeapWord* array_addr = reinterpret_cast<HeapWord*>(array);
>> ShenandoahHeapRegion* r = _heap->heap_region_containing(array_addr);
>> if (is_old_marking) {
>> // Generational, old marking
>> assert(_heap->mode()->is_generational(), "Invariant");
>> if (r->is_old() && (array_addr < _heap->marking_context()->top_at_mark_start(r))) {
>> arraycopy_work<T, false, false, true>(array, count);
>> }
>> } else if (_heap->mode()->is_generational()) {
>> // Generational, young marking
>> if (r->is_old() || (array_addr < _heap->marking_context()->top_at_mark_start(r))) {
>> arraycopy_work<T, false, false, true>(array, count);
>> }
>> } else if (array_addr < _heap->marking_context()->top_at_mark_start(r)) {
>> // Non-generational, marking
>> arraycopy_work<T, false, false, true>(array, count);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> New:
>>
>> if (ShenandoahSATBBarrier) {
>> if (!_heap->marking_context()->allocated_after_mark_start(reinterpret_cast<HeapWord*>(dst))) {
>> arraycopy_work<T, false, false, true>(dst, count);
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> With the new STAB barrier code for arraycopy_marking, if is it young GC and the array is in old region, but array is above TAMS, arraycopy_work won't be applied anymore, so we may have missed some pointers in SATB in such case.
>>
>> ### Test
>> - [x] hotspot_gc_shenandoah
>> - [x] repeat gc/TestAllocHumongousFragment.java#generational and sure it won't crash with the fix
>> - [x] GHA
>
> Xiaolong Peng has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Add include header shenandoahOldGeneration.hpp
We talked offline. The assertion must be weakened to account for dirty write cards because the young pointer could be put in the old array _after_ init mark. We cannot expect the read card to be dirty in this case.
-------------
Marked as reviewed by wkemper (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28669#pullrequestreview-3546805335
More information about the shenandoah-dev
mailing list