RFR: 8284016: Normalize handshake closure names [v3]

[Anton Artemov]

On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:48:14 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty <dcubed at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> src/hotspot/share/prims/jvmtiEnvBase.hpp line 511:
>> 
>>> 509: };
>>> 510: 
>>> 511: class SetForceEarlyReturnHandshakeClosure : public JvmtiUnitedHandshakeClosure {
>> 
>> I do not support this unification over JVMTI files. This make `HandshakeClosure` class names too long.
>> The JVMTI has a consistent local naming convention to have the suffix `Closure` at the end instead of `HandshakeClosure`. And it is fine because normally there are no other kind of closures in JVMTI code.
>
> Aren't there closures in the JVM/TI tag processing code? I could be remembering wrong...

I reverted closure names changes in JVMT files.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26014#discussion_r2174895464