RFR: 8350566: NMT: add size parameter to MemTracker::record_virtual_memory_tag
Gerard Ziemski
gziemski at openjdk.org
Wed Mar 5 15:32:03 UTC 2025
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 09:49:41 GMT, Afshin Zafari <azafari at openjdk.org> wrote:
> With the `size` parameter there will be no need to traverse/go through the nodes between the base and end of the region.
> Tests:
> linux-x64-debug, gtest:NMT* and runtime/NMT*
Changes requested by gziemski (Reviewer).
Changes requested by gziemski (Reviewer).
src/hotspot/share/cds/metaspaceShared.cpp line 1475:
> 1473: (address)archive_space_rs.base() == base_address, "Sanity");
> 1474: // Register archive space with NMT.
> 1475: MemTracker::record_virtual_memory_tag(archive_space_rs.base(), archive_space_rs.size(), mtClassShared);
The pattern here is:
`something.base(), something.base.size()`
instead of doing this over and over again, why can't we just pass `something` to MemTracker::record_virtual_memory_tag() and let it figure out `base` and `size` itself?
src/hotspot/share/cds/metaspaceShared.cpp line 1548:
> 1546: return nullptr;
> 1547: }
> 1548: // NMT: fix up the space tags
What exactly needs to be fixed here?
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23770#pullrequestreview-2661498707
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23770#pullrequestreview-2661515550
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23770#discussion_r1981647511
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23770#discussion_r1981635746
More information about the shenandoah-dev
mailing list