RFR: 2331: Improve review notes [v3]
Pavel Rappo
prappo at openjdk.org
Mon Aug 12 10:19:21 UTC 2024
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 20:24:38 GMT, Erik Joelsson <erikj at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I'm ok with Kevin's proposed behavior, but I'm not sure what the significance of your last question is, Pavel. Are we behaving differently today when the commit has gone missing or the branch has changed?
>
> Also, when this is all done, could you summarize the complete behavior in the bug description, or comment, similar to how Kevin presented it here?
> I'm not sure what the significance of your last question is, Pavel. Are we behaving differently today when the commit has gone missing or the branch has changed?
In either of those two cases, in master, we display the "🔄" emoji and the word "required" regardless of whether the PR has been sufficiently reviewed:
https://github.com/openjdk/skara/blob/45468cde2dc5273c70f728c46c6b133e3d16b55a/bots/pr/src/main/java/org/openjdk/skara/bots/pr/CheckRun.java#L602-L622
If we are trying to generally improve review notes, we perhaps should treat those two cases similarly to our main/typical case?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/skara/pull/1679#discussion_r1713486971
More information about the skara-dev
mailing list