RFR: 2331: Improve review notes [v3]

Kevin Rushforth kcr at openjdk.org
Thu Aug 15 00:06:18 UTC 2024


On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:48:52 GMT, Erik Joelsson <erikj at openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> I'm not sure what the significance of your last question is, Pavel. Are we behaving differently today when the commit has gone missing or the branch has changed?
>> 
>> In either of those two cases, in master, we display the "🔄" emoji and the word "required" regardless of whether the PR has been sufficiently reviewed:
>> 
>> https://github.com/openjdk/skara/blob/45468cde2dc5273c70f728c46c6b133e3d16b55a/bots/pr/src/main/java/org/openjdk/skara/bots/pr/CheckRun.java#L602-L622
>> 
>> If we are trying to generally improve review notes, we perhaps should treat those two cases similarly to our main/typical case?
>
> I agree, those cases should be folded into the new behavior with regards to emojis.

Yes, I agree with this.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/skara/pull/1679#discussion_r1717652017


More information about the skara-dev mailing list