Syncup call: review contribution proposals and technical issues

[Nutter, Mark]

I prefer the 14th if possible.

--mark
________________________________________
From: sumatra-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [sumatra-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] on behalf of Morichetti, Laurent [Laurent.Morichetti at amd.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 5:14 PM
To: sumatra-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: Syncup call: review contribution proposals and technical issues

I am only available on 11/14.

-Laurent

-----Original Message-----
From: sumatra-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:sumatra-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Howes, Lee
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 12:54 PM
To: Venkatachalam, Vasanth; sumatra-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: Syncup call: review contribution proposals and technical issues

I'd rather do the 14th if possible.

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: sumatra-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:sumatra-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Venkatachalam, Vasanth
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 12:25
To: sumatra-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: Syncup call: review contribution proposals and technical issues

Either day is fine with me.

Vasanth

-----Original Message-----
From: sumatra-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:sumatra-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Eric Caspole
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 2:02 PM
To: sumatra-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Syncup call: review contribution proposals and technical issues

Either day is OK with me.
Eric


On 11/08/2012 09:18 AM, Harle, Christophe wrote:
> All:
>
> We propose setting up an initial Sumatra project sync-up call next week to review near term contribution plans and discuss outstanding technical issues .
> If you are interested in attending this call, reply to this thread indicating which of the following proposed dates/time you prefer: Nov 13 8-10am PST or Nov 14 8-10am PST; we will choose the date that gather the largest number of votes,.
>
> In the spirit of seeding the discussion for this initial call, the AMD team got together and would like to propose the following initial milestone for Sumatra.
>
> This proposed milestone involves moving enough of Aparapi's implementation down into the Project Lambda enabled JVM to allow Lambda enabled Aparapi demos/workloads to execute directly (no Aparapi.dll). Whilst this effort would constrain demos/examples to Aparapi's existing programming model constraints (parallel primitive arrays only) it would act as a 'tracer bullet' through the code base, allowing us to familiarize ourselves with the various major JVM components that we think will to impacted via a Sumatra implementation.
>
> Maybe others might like to use this discussion thread to offer other milestone proposals which we could also discuss in the upcoming call.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christophe
>