<Swing Dev> [PATCH] 6179357-related: warnings removal
Florian Brunner
fbrunnerlist at gmx.ch
Mon Jun 30 21:22:42 UTC 2008
Ok, no problem.
-Florian
Am Mittwoch, 18. Juni 2008 schrieb Pavel Porvatov:
> Hi Florian,
>
> I'm working on your patches and now completed about 30%. There are
> really many changes in your fix and I made changes in your changes, so
> it's not very fast...
>
> Regards, Pavel.
>
> > Hi Pavel,
> >
> > I just wanted to ask what the status of my patches is. I would like to
> > continue to provide patches once those could be integrated.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > -Florian
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008 schrieb Pavel Porvatov:
> >> Hi Florian,
> >>
> >> Great! I'll start work on it shortly.
> >>
> >> Thanks, Pavel.
> >>
> >>> Hi Pavel,
> >>>
> >>> it took a little longer than I thought, but now I've updated my patches
> >>> to base on http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/swing/jdk and removed all
> >>> the tabs.
> >>>
> >>> Unfortunatly it wasn't easily possible to port all patches. So I send
> >>> here the big part and after integration I will try to remove some of
> >>> the other warnings again before I start with adding generics to the
> >>> Swing framework.
> >>>
> >>> When compiling with
> >>> -Xlint -J-Xms80m -J-Xmx256m -Xlint:-serial -Xlint:-deprecation
> >>> -Xlint:-fallthrough -Xmaxwarns 2300
> >>> this patch reduces the number of reported warnings from 1263 to 240.
> >>>
> >>> Again, I tried only to change things related to the warnings and not to
> >>> change any public or protected APIs in public or protected classes in
> >>> this patch.
> >>>
> >>> At many places I tried to add type parameters as meaningful as
> >>> possible, but with some cases I just used Object, if a more meaningful
> >>> type parameter was not so trivial. You might want to refactor this if
> >>> needed. (Though everything should work as it is.)
> >>>
> >>> -Florian
> >>>
> >>> Am Dienstag, 29. April 2008 schrieb Florian Brunner:
> >>>> Hi Pavel,
> >>>>
> >>>>> Send me all remaining fixes at once. I changed my opinion because
> >>>>> 1. I don't want to produce a lot of CRs for every part of fix
> >>>>> 2. I'm going to do a small correction (if needed of course) in your
> >>>>> fix myself. It'll save a lot of our time
> >>>>
> >>>> Ok, great, I will do that as soon as I find some spare time (probably
> >>>> during the coming long week-end).
> >>>>
> >>>> -Florian
More information about the swing-dev
mailing list