<Swing Dev> code review request: 7049024: DnD fails with JTextArea and JTextField

[Pavel Porvatov]

Hi Sean,

I've committed your fix ( 
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/323f6d046cc9) and closed CR 
7049024

Thanks for contribution,

Pavel.
> Hi all,
>> On 28/10/2011 11:39, Neil Richards wrote:
>>> :
>>> Hi Pavel,
>>> I'm not sure I understand the problem here.
>>>
>>> There have been several successful submissions previously committed
>>> using exactly this form of copyright statement, eg:
>>>
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/c0602036be5d
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/98688c4be64b
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/338c5b815ff2
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/c1e87a18e46a
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/28037efa90a3
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/7d1b13126574
>>>
>>> I'm sure if you check on your side you'll find that this is an accepted
>>> and agreed form of statement for IBM folk to use (for IBM created
>>> content, such as new testcases).
>>>
>>> Regards, Neil
>> Neil seems to have cc'ed me on this reply, I was otherwise not 
>> following this thread.
>>
>> Pavel - we went through similar confusion on core-libs-dev a while 
>> back. Looking at this webrev, I don't see any issues as it's the same 
>> header that Neil, and his colleagues, have used on other tests that 
>> they have contributed.
>>
> I don't see problems with the header now as well, because I got 
> approve for this copyright a couple days ago... So I will commit the 
> fix soon.
>
>> Assuming IBM contributes under the OCA then IBM keeps the copyright,
>> since the OCA isn't a copyright assignment. See also Mark Reinhold's
>> explanation:
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7-dev/2009-June/000716.html
> That an old explanation. Situation could be changed since that time...
>
> Regards, Pavel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/attachments/20111103/b45d52b6/attachment.html>