<Swing Dev> code review request: 7049024: DnD fails with JTextArea and JTextField

[Pavel Porvatov]

Hi all,
> On 28/10/2011 11:39, Neil Richards wrote:
>> :
>> Hi Pavel,
>> I'm not sure I understand the problem here.
>>
>> There have been several successful submissions previously committed
>> using exactly this form of copyright statement, eg:
>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/c0602036be5d
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/98688c4be64b
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/338c5b815ff2
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/c1e87a18e46a
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/28037efa90a3
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/7d1b13126574
>>
>> I'm sure if you check on your side you'll find that this is an accepted
>> and agreed form of statement for IBM folk to use (for IBM created
>> content, such as new testcases).
>>
>> Regards, Neil
> Neil seems to have cc'ed me on this reply, I was otherwise not 
> following this thread.
>
> Pavel - we went through similar confusion on core-libs-dev a while 
> back. Looking at this webrev, I don't see any issues as it's the same 
> header that Neil, and his colleagues, have used on other tests that 
> they have contributed.
>
I don't see problems with the header now as well, because I got approve 
for this copyright a couple days ago... So I will commit the fix soon.

> Assuming IBM contributes under the OCA then IBM keeps the copyright,
> since the OCA isn't a copyright assignment. See also Mark Reinhold's
> explanation:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7-dev/2009-June/000716.html
That an old explanation. Situation could be changed since that time...

Regards, Pavel