<Swing Dev> Request review for 7089914: Focus on image icons are not visible in javaws cache with high contrast mode
Pavel Porvatov
pavel.porvatov at oracle.com
Thu Feb 16 13:58:27 UTC 2012
Hi Sean,
> Hi Pavel,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion, I didn't know DesktopProperty could
> be used this way.
> I modified it a little, it's
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zhouyx/7089914/webrev.05/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ezhouyx/7089914/webrev.05/> .
>
> The reason for checking high contrast is windows allow
> "win.3d.backgroundColor" to
> be set black in non-high contrast mode.
>
> The testcase is also cleared. Please review again.
I modified your fix a little bit and rewrote the test (because it
contained concurrency problems, e.g. the passed field must be volatile
etc). Here is the commit:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/362867d5caa4
Thanks, Pavel
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Pavel Porvatov
> <pavel.porvatov at oracle.com <mailto:pavel.porvatov at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Sean,
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> I modified the patch again. It's now at
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zhouyx/7089914/webrev.03/
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ezhouyx/7089914/webrev.03/> .
>> 3/4 comments are covered. And there are a little comment bellow,
>> please have a look. Thanks.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Pavel Porvatov
>> <pavel.porvatov at oracle.com <mailto:pavel.porvatov at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>> There are several comments for your patch:
>>
>> 1. I found one bug. In Win 7 there are several differnet High
>> Contrast themes. Under one of them ("High Contrast White")
>> focus is not visible...
>>
>> This is fixed.
> Is there any reason to check high contrast mode in the
> WDesktopProperties class? I think in non-high contrast mode
> backgroundColor checking will be useful as well
>
>>
>> 2. I also don't like synthetic property. Any desktop property
>> has listener (see
>> com.sun.java.swing.plaf.windows.DesktopProperty#pcl) and
>> updated when correspondent value is changed. But your
>> win.button.focusColor property is updated only while full
>> property reloading.
>>
>> I tried to not use DesktopProperty, but it is found that
>> the modification becomes much more complex and not working well.
>> On the other hand, I think
>> use DesktopProperty is reasonable: it is so much like a
>> desktop property that the only difference is it can not be
>> changed separately.
> What do you think about the following solution:
>
> static class FocusColorProperty extends DesktopProperty {
> FocusColorProperty(Object fallback) {
> super("win.3d.backgroundColor", fallback);
> }
>
> @Override
> protected Object configureValue(Object value) {
> return Color.BLACK.equals(value) ? Color.WHITE :
> Color.BLACK;
> }
> }
>
> This class solves update problems. Actually I didn't check that
> but it seems it should work...
>
>
>>
>> 3. Please don't add references to bugs in the code. Everybody
>> can trace history of the code by VCS.
>>
>> Reference removed.
>>
>>
>> 4. The changes in the class WindowsRadioButtonUI looks good.
>> Is it possible to make your TestButton test an automatic one
>> and add it to the fix?
>>
>> Test case added.
> Could you please clean the test from TODO and dead code (like
> commented code)
>
> Regards, Pavel
>
>>
>> Regards, Pavel
>>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This is for bug 7089914,
>>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7089914 .
>>> OpenJDK uses black as focus color in windows LAF. However,
>>> in high contrast mode, windows
>>> uses white as focus color.
>>> In additional, the patch also
>>> modified WindowsRadioButtonUI.java so it will reload its style
>>> when system setting is changed.
>>>
>>> The webrev link is :
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zhouyx/7089914/webrev.02/
>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ezhouyx/7089914/webrev.02/>
>>>
>>> The previous discussions are:
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2011-September/001703.html
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2011-October/001794.html
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2011-December/001871.html
>>>
>>> Any comments on the this version? thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Sean Chou
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Sean Chou
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/attachments/20120216/28780046/attachment.html>
More information about the swing-dev
mailing list