<Swing Dev> 7189299 DefaultButtonModel instance keeps stale listeners of JButton in case of multiple SwingUtilities.updateComponentTreeUI() calls
Frank Ding
dingxmin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Oct 8 07:04:31 UTC 2012
Hi Pavel,
Thanks for you reply. I have thought it through and have to have
this solution. The pain point is that these private access level
listeners are completely encapsulated. But there is another possible
fix that won't bother introducing cleanup api but would require
1. Make ComponentView.setComponentParent method become protected for
FormView to override (package level is not adequate because FormView
resides under a different package). This allows FormView instance to
determine de-registration condition.
2. Make ComponentView.c (private Invalidator c) become protected for
FormView to access.
It doesn't bring about new cleanup public api but make hidden
setComponentParent and c come to surface. Do you think it is preferable
than cleanup one? Or I would be more than glad to know another approach.
Best regards,
Frank
On 10/5/2012 8:39 PM, pavel porvatov wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>> Hi Pavel,
>> Thanks for your comment. I improved my fix again and uploaded to
>> the following address
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dingxmin/7189299/webrev.03/
>>
>> This revision offers a different approach where
>> 1. In ComponentView, setComponentParent method, the best place that
>> is entitled to detect de-registration condition because only in class
>> ComponentView can var "Invalidator c" be accessed.
>> 2. If the condition is satisfied (this.getParent()==null &&
>> c.getParent() !=null), call a newly added protected method "cleanup"
>> to let subclass do house clean up work.
>> 3. FormView.cleanup does the actual work of removing listeners from
>> DefaultButtonModel.
>> 4. However, listener instances to be de-registered are protected
>> members of AbstractButton, we need to have a JButton wrapper exposing
>> these listeners, which leads to declaration of JButtonWrapper inner
>> class.
>>
>> I think this time is much better than the reflection one. Could you
>> please take a took and give your comment? I may need to refine
>> javadoc of cleanup protected method later.
> You added new method in public API
> (javax.swing.text.ComponentView#cleanup). Is it possible to fix the
> problem without extending API? I don't think this method will be
> useful for other people...
>
> Thanks, Pavel
>>
>> Thanks and best regards,
>> Frank
>>
>> On 9/13/2012 7:50 PM, Pavel Porvatov wrote:
>>> Hi Frank,
>>>> Hi Pavel
>>>> It's been a long time since last discussion. Now I have a new
>>>> approach to the issue.
>>>> The basic idea is removing the listener pertaining to JButton
>>>> instance from DefaultButtonModel when the corresponding FormView
>>>> instance is about to retire.
>>>>
>>>> The best place I can find in source code to achieve it is in
>>>> FormView's super class ComponentView, method void setComponentParent.
>>>> View p = getParent();
>>>> if (p != null) {
>>>> ....
>>>> } else {
>>>> // when p is null, it means the FormView instance is about to
>>>> retire
>>>> // deregister listener off shared DefaultButtonModel instance
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> However, the biggest problem is that the listener to be removed
>>>> is a private member of AbstractButton and the only way is holding
>>>> the listener object and then calling various removeXXXListener on
>>>> DefaultButtonModel with the listener being parameter. I have to
>>>> resort to reflection which makes it look more like a workaround.
>>>> What's more, reflection introduces implementation dependency.
>>>> In addition to the change to fix, I also updated its jtreg test
>>>> case according to your comments.
>>>> Could you please review it again @
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dingxmin/7189299/webrev.02
>>> We don't use reflection in the SWING library. Could you please try
>>> to find another way of fix?
>>>
>>> Regards, Pavel
>>>
>>
>
More information about the swing-dev
mailing list