<Swing Dev> [8] Review Request: 8029264 [doclint] more doclint and tidy cleanup

Yuri Nesterenko yuri.nesterenko at oracle.com
Thu Dec 5 13:27:47 UTC 2013


Thank you guys!

-yan

On 12/05/2013 05:20 PM, sergey malenkov wrote:
> The fix look OK for me too.
>
> SAM
>
> On 04.12.2013 18:45, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
>>
>>   The fix looks good for me.
>>
>>   Thanks,
>>   Alexandr.
>>
>> On 12/4/2013 6:24 PM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
>>> Colleagues,
>>>
>>>
>>> Please review another version of the fix.
>>> Here's the webrev:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8029264/webrev.01
>>> Bug is:
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029264
>>>
>>>
>>> Here, @code changed to @literal
>>> in certain places and < and > changed (in my changes but not
>>> elsewhere) to {@literal <} and {@literal >} corresp.
>>>
>>> I didn't change ≥ and ≤ though: I swear they look much better
>>> than @literal variants, and even easier to read.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -yan
>>>
>>> On 12/04/2013 04:47 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    There is the definition of the JDK 1.5 tags:
>>>> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/javadoc/whatsnew-1.5.0.html#tags
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    The {@literal} tag denotes literal text. The enclosed text is
>>>> interpreted as not containing HTML markup or nested javadoc tags. For
>>>> example, the doc comment text: {@literal a<B>c}
>>>>      displays in the generated HTML page unchanged: a<B>c -- that is,
>>>> the <B> is not interpreted as bold.
>>>>    The {@code} tag formats literal text in the code font. It is
>>>> equivalent to <code>{@literal}</code>.
>>>>
>>>>    JOptionPane.java
>>>>   - * centered on the screen (depending on the L&F).
>>>>   + * centered on the screen (depending on the {@code L&F}).
>>>>   It seems that it is better to use the literal tag here.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   RowFilter.java
>>>>   -     * columns are < 0.
>>>>   +     * columns are < 0.
>>>>   The literal tag can be used here also.
>>>>
>>>>   Thanks,
>>>>   Alexandr.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/4/2013 11:47 AM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
>>>>> One more time! Please take a look.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mailing list is a lousy tool for review requests like this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -yan
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/02/2013 06:07 PM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
>>>>>> Colleagues,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> please review this yet another cleanup request.
>>>>>> They will never end but then again, they are easy to review.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's the webrev:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8029264/webrev.00
>>>>>> Bug is:
>>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029264
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My routine was:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> increase number of allowed warnings/errors; enable doclint.
>>>>>> make all docs > log 2>&1
>>>>>> Pick up swing files to clean.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Clean, running DocLint on them repeatedly, until I only have
>>>>>> unfixable
>>>>>> (for now) issues.
>>>>>> make all docs > log 2>&1
>>>>>> Pick up swing HTML files related to my original list,
>>>>>> run tidy -e on them.
>>>>>> Repeat the cleanup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As a result, no real code, animal, or plant was harmed.
>>>>>> Some doc issues were eliminated.
>>>>>> Tidy is happy with resulting HTML; the only doclint criteria
>>>>>> still violated require CCC or convention changes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are interested in checking doclint output, try
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $JAVA_HOME/bin/java -cp $JAVA_HOME/lib/tools.jar \
>>>>>> com.sun.tools.doclint.DocLint -Xmsgs:all Whatever.java
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> -yan
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>




More information about the swing-dev mailing list