<Swing Dev> <AWT Dev> [8] Review request for CR 7145406 - [macosx] Migrate Apple tests from macosx-port to 7u

[Phil Race]

Konstantin,

First I am puzzled by the decision to send this to AWT and Swing lists.
There are a couple of Swing tests and  a large number of AWT tests
but it seems to be also a very large number of 2D/graphics tests PLUS
a large scattering in other areas such as
- hotspot/managment
- jndi
- java.io
- java.nio
- threading
- reflection
- networking.

Next, I am surprised to see jtreg tests that depend on junit.

I just searched our entire regression test suite (including ones that
are still closed for various reasons) and I didn't find *any* client area
tests that have this dependency.

All I found are a few core java reflection tests.
Nor should these tests depend on the harness in "package test.java.awt"

So they should all be standalone tests that can be run without any harness.

On top of that I seriously doubt that these all even *compile* on anything
besides OS X, and may not pass elsewhere either

cf : 31 import com.apple.eio.FileManager;
As it is none of this appears appropriate to put into the test directory.

So this
1) First needs to be rid of harness dependencies
2) Needs to be made to compile on all platforms or invoked by a script
which builds only on OS X
3) All tests that build on all platforms must pass on all platforms
4) The review needs to be send to all affected lists - which is pretty 
much all of them!
awt, 2d, swing, hotspot, core-libs .. maybe more

-phil.



On 3/11/2013 2:03 AM, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
> Please, review the fix.
>
> On 06-Mar-13 15:14, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/7145406/webrev.02/
>>
>> Changed tags to @run junit
>>
>> On 04-Mar-13 14:44, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>> A few options exists:
>>> 1 Changes tag to @run junit + jtreg 4.1
>>> 2 Remove usage of junit from these tests.
>>>
>>> 01.03.2013 14:26, Alexander Scherbatiy пишет:
>>>> On 3/1/2013 1:29 PM, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01-Mar-13 13:24, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>>> 01.03.2013 12:24, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>>>>>>> I have already ran those tests on Windows before sending this 
>>>>>>> request, all is OK 95% pass.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I should also note that we (STT regression team) use JTREG 3.2 
>>>>>>> for testing with option 
>>>>>>> -cpa:$JEMMY_PATH/jemmy.jar,$JUNIT_PATH/junit.jar
>>>>>> As far as I understand, jtreg 3 doesn't contain junit.jar.
>>>>> There is no junit.jar in JTREG 3, but it could be taken elsewhere.
>>>>> But if it is standard to use @run junit tag, we will replace jtreg 
>>>>> we use to version 4.1.
>>>>
>>>>     The jtreg 3 does not have fix for the issue "7113599 jtreg 
>>>> should handle GNOME_DESKTOP_SESSION_ID" which affects some L&F 
>>>> Swing tests on Unix systems.
>>>>
>>>>     I would suggest to use the JTreg 4.1. The standard is to use 
>>>> the @run junit tag for the JTReg 4.1 (in other case the junit lib 
>>>> is not put to the test JDK classpath).
>>>>     The junit.jar has been removed from the JTReg 4.1 lib directory 
>>>> because of the licensing reasons: 
>>>> https://blogs.oracle.com/jjg/entry/jtreg_update1
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks,
>>>>     Alexandr.
>>>>
>>>>>>> JTREG 3.2 is more stable than 4.1. We do not use JTREG 4.1. So I 
>>>>>>> suggest NOT to replace @run main to @run juint, and, istead of 
>>>>>>> that add jtreg option -cpa:$JUNIT_PATH/junit.jar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 28-Feb-13 18:35, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi, Konstantin.
>>>>>>>> I think yes. Please try to run these tests on windows as well. 
>>>>>>>> At least they should be compiled.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 28.02.2013 17:55, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I used JTREG 4.1 fcs b03, not b05. Indeed, if one uses b05, 
>>>>>>>>> one gets compilation errors. So should I replace @run main to 
>>>>>>>>> @run juint in all 150 tests?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 28-Feb-13 17:46, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Strange, but I used JTReg 4.1 b05 also and I had no 
>>>>>>>>>> compilation errors. JUnit is automatically added in the 
>>>>>>>>>> latest JTREG 4.1.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 28-Feb-13 17:02, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/27/2013 5:45 PM, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> I replaced Thread.sleep() with toolkit.realSync() and made 
>>>>>>>>>>>> swing mwthod to run on EDT.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> New webrev: 
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/7145406/webrev.01
>>>>>>>>>>>>> test/javax/swing/JComponent/DoublePaint/TestDoublePaint.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     - Is it possible to run the test with jtreg or JUnit 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is necessary for the test invocation?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>     I run the test and got the compilation error: 
>>>>>>>>>>> TestDoublePaint.java:34: error: package junit.framework does 
>>>>>>>>>>> not exist.
>>>>>>>>>>>     It seems it is because the '@run main TestDoublePaint' 
>>>>>>>>>>> jtreg task does not put the junit jar to the test jdk class 
>>>>>>>>>>> path.
>>>>>>>>>>>     The '@run junit TestDoublePaint' task passes the test. 
>>>>>>>>>>> (I use the JTReg 4.1 b05 from 
>>>>>>>>>>> http://download.java.net/openjdk/jtreg/)
>>>>>>>>>>>     It is also interesting is it necessary to have the main 
>>>>>>>>>>> method for the junit task?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>    Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>    Alexandr.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     -  line: 68 Thread.sleep(2000); // 2 seconds should be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> plenty enough to catch 2 repaints
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       Is it possible to use the toolkit.realSync() method 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> here?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Swing classes should be created and used on the EDT.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Alexandr.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>