<Swing Dev> Review Request for 8042284: Add block tags for @return and @param to swing plaf classes

[Steve Sides]

We've been addressing mostly just the doclint warnings, first missing 
tags (and some comments), then missing comments.
I like the scrubbing list provided in 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-July/008231.html .
Would you suggest we do that for the complete files rather than just 
address doclint issues?...I'd like to update the <tags> to {@tags} and 
more uniform formatting in particular.

-steve

On 7/17/2014 12:43 PM, Phil Race wrote:
> http://sqeweb.us.oracle.com/coretools/ssides/webrevs/8042284/8042284.4/src/share/classes/javax/swing/plaf/ComponentUI.java.sdiff.html 
>
>
> You didn't do anything about the (many) uses of <code>FOO</code> like 
> this :-
>
> * Returns <code>true</code> if the specified <i>x,y</i> location is
>  231      * contained within the look and feel's defined shape of the 
> specified
>  232      * component. <code>x</code> and <code>y</code> ar
>
> Elsewhere (eg) this file
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8050852/webrev.02/src/share/classes/javax/sound/midi/Instrument.java.sdiff.html 
>
> in this thread : - 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2014-July/008231.html
>
> I'm seeing these replaced by {@code FOO}
>
> You have used that syntax in your new doc but left alone the others.
>
> So it seems you are focused solely on the @param and @throws tags.
>
> Is the rest being handled by someone else ?
>
> -phil.
>
> On 7/17/2014 12:32 PM, Steve Sides wrote:
>> Hello,
>>   This is a redo of the changes so that they are based on jdk9/client 
>> rather than jdk9/dev.
>> Could you please review these fixes for doclint warnings for 
>> javax/swing/plaf.
>> This addresses mostly just missing @param and @return tags.
>>
>> bugID:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042284
>>
>> Webrev corresponding:
>> http://sqeweb.us.oracle.com/coretools/ssides/webrevs/8042284/8042284.4/
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> steve
>>
>>
>> On 7/1/2014 8:50 AM, Steve Sides wrote:
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042284
>>>
>>> Webrev corresponding:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssides/8042284/8042284.3/
>>>
>>> This addresses missing @parm and @return block tags in javadoc for
>>> javax/swing/plaf classes as noted by doclint.
>>>
>>> It does not address methods which are missing javadoc comment 
>>> altogether,
>>> of which there are several.
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> -steve
>>>
>>
>