<Swing Dev> [9] Review request for 8164032 JViewport backing store image is not scaled on HiDPI display
Alexandr Scherbatiy
alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com
Tue Aug 30 12:54:12 UTC 2016
Hello,
Could you review the updated fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8164032/webrev.04/
The Component.createVolatileImage() is used to create a backing store
volatile image.
On 8/29/2016 4:18 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> On 19.08.16 10:15, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
>> On 8/18/2016 3:05 PM, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Could you review the updated fix:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8164032/webrev.02
>>>
>>> The backing store image is recreated for the case where scaled sizes
>>> are changed.
>>
>> A version where a VolatileImage is used as a backing store image:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8164032/webrev.03/
>
> The VI case looks simpler. I guess it can be simplified even more:
> Peobably this code is unnecessary?
> } else if (vImg instanceof SunVolatileImage) {
> 753 SunVolatileImage svImg = (SunVolatileImage)
> vImg;
> 754 if
> (!graphicsConfig.equals(svImg.getGraphicsConfig())) {
> 755 backingStoreImage = null;
> 756 }
> 757 }
>
> My understanding is that if VI.validate!=IMAGE_INCOMPATIBLE then we
> can use it for drawing even if the GC is different?
Different graphics configurations can have different default
transforms. The backing store image should be recreated in this case.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
> Probably we can reuse Component.createVolatileImage() instead of
> createImage()?
>
> Also can you please check a performance of these two solutions?
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alexandr.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alexandr.
>>>
>>> On 8/17/2016 5:05 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>> On 17.08.16 14:02, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you review the updated fix:
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8164032/webrev.01
>>>>>
>>>>> The generic transform is used for the backing store image scaling.
>>>>
>>>> As far as I understand the current fix will not work if the scale was
>>>> changed(the JViewport will use old buffer)?
>>>>
>>>> It seems that the new local AbstractMultiResolutionImage contain only
>>>> one image variant inside and looks quite similar to the
>>>> VolatileImage, probably we can change this cache from BufferedImage
>>>> to VolatileImage? In this case the scale of the VI will be the same
>>>> as "g":
>>>> g.getDeviceConfiguration().createCompatibleVolatileImage()
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 8/15/2016 4:58 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>>> Hi, Alexandr.
>>>>>> I doubt that getScaleX/getScaleY can be used here because the scale
>>>>>> can be generic(translate+rotate+scale). How this cache will work if
>>>>>> transform will be changed after we save "backingStoreImage"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 15.08.16 16:16, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could you review the fix:
>>>>>>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164032
>>>>>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8164032/webrev.00
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fix scales the JViewport backing store image when graphics
>>>>>>> transform is not identity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Alexandr.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
More information about the swing-dev
mailing list