<Swing Dev> RfR JDK-8161483 Implement AccessibleAction interface in JList.AccessibleJList.AccessibleJListChild

[Pete Brunet]

Look at .02 instead.  I had an extraneous println left in .01.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8161483/webrev.02/

On 7/19/16 11:48 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> I added a regression test:
>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8161483/webrev.01/
>
> Could someone please review that?
>
> I also need one more +1 on the code change.
>
> TiA, Pete
>
> On 7/19/16 3:17 AM, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
>>
>> The fix looks good to me.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alexandr.
>>
>> On 7/19/2016 5:10 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>>> Please review the following:
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8161483
>>> Patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8161483/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> This is a followon to the patch for
>>> JDK-8145207 [macosx] JList, VO can't access non-visible list items
>>>
>>> In order to fixJDK-8145207the AccessibleAction interface was needed
>>> for JList.AccessibleJList.AccessibleJListChild but a backport of
>>> this fix has been requested and the released public API can not be
>>> changed in 8u or earlier.  The workaround for JDK-8145207 is to
>>> create and use a private subclass of
>>> JList.AccessibleJList.AccessibleJListChild,
>>> JList.AccessibleJList.ActionableAccessibleJListChild.  The downside
>>> of this fix is that it returns a subclass of the
>>> JList.AccessibleJList.AccessibleJListChild.  If a user overrides the
>>> class and returns from its code it will not inherit the
>>> AccessibleAction behavior.  For JDK 9 the
>>> ActionableAccessibleJListChild subclass should be removed and the
>>> AccessibleAction implementation moved to
>>> JList.AccessibleJList.AccessibleJListChild.
>>>
>>> TiA,
>>> Pete 
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/attachments/20160719/a684cc07/attachment.html>