<Swing Dev> <AWT Dev> RFR(L): 8159690: [TESTBUG] Mark headful tests with @key headful.

Lindenmaier, Goetz goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com
Fri Jun 17 08:42:44 UTC 2016


Hi Alexandr,

> What is a number of tests which passe in headless mode?
Do you mean you want to know wheter there are awt/swing tests that are
passing in headless mode and if yes, how many?
  javax/swing: 223 passing
  sun/java2d:   34 passing
  java/awt:    312 pasing

> I would expect that an ordinary client test which use Frame and 
> fails in headless mode does not require a special key by default.
You mean the jtreg runner somehow finds out that the failure is
caused by running headless, after having the test executed? I 
don't think that's possible.  
Or do you exclude these tests by another mechanism?

I did this change following the pattern of 
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/1cce0248f3e1
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8081547

Best regards,
  Goetz.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandr Scherbatiy [mailto:alexandr.scherbatiy at oracle.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2016 17:56
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; swing-
> dev at openjdk.java.net; awt-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: <AWT Dev> RFR(L): 8159690: [TESTBUG] Mark headful tests with
> @key headful.
> 
> On 6/16/2016 5:40 PM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> 
> 
> 	Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> 	we have test machines without X server. On these many of the jdk
> 
> 	jtreg tests fail with a headless exception.
> 
> 	We grepped for this exception in the test output and identified
> 
> 	about 450 tests.
> 
> 
> 
> 	In these tests, we added with another script "@key headful".
> 
>    What is a number of tests which passe in headless mode?
> 
>   I would expect that an ordinary client test which use Frame and fails in
> headless mode does not require a special key by default.
> 
>   Thanks,
>   Alexandr.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 	So that the script generates better output, I adapted the
> 
> 	formatting of some of the test descriptions.
> 
> 	see also the text in the webrev, where I posted some incremental
> diffs
> 
> 	of the changes I more or less edited by hand.  I hope this eases
> 
> 	reviewing :)
> 
> 
> 
> 	Last, I updated the Copyrights with the script by Coleen.
> 
> 
> 
> 	Please review this change.
> 
> 	<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Egoetz/wr16/8159690-
> headful/webrev.01/> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr16/8159690-
> headful/webrev.01/
> 
> 
> 
> 	Best regards,
> 
> 	  Goetz.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




More information about the swing-dev mailing list