<Swing Dev> <AWT Dev> [9] Review Request: 8143077 Deprecate InputEvent._MASK in favor of InputEvent._DOWN_MASK
Semyon Sadetsky
semyon.sadetsky at oracle.com
Wed Oct 19 06:58:11 UTC 2016
On 10/17/2016 9:53 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> On 17.10.16 21:47, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
>>> It can be replaced if it will be used in pair with getModifiersEx().
>>> The old getModifiers() is also deprecated. And javadoc for
>>> getModifiersEx() describes what and how constants should be used.
>> Can you add link to getModifiersEx() to all those constants' specs?
>
> I assume you mean the new _DOWN constants not the old?
I meant that deprecated message should be transparently explaining the
impact of the replacement.
The proposed specs change recommends to use a replacement which is not
equivalent to the deprecated API. And that is the reason why you don't
like to eliminate all old API usages in the JDK code as a part of the
fix, if I correctly understand you previous reply in this thread.
Since you are insisting that migrating to the new API is risky it is
worth let the user know about that risk as well.
>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And, please, limit the length of the changed line in VMPanel.java
>>>>>>>> to 80
>>>>>>>> chars.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/2016 4:53 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the comments.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The new version:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8143077/webrev.01
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The specification of Event class and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> InputEvent.getModifiers()
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 30.09.16 19:08, Jonathan Bluett-Duncan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sergey,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not a reviewer, but after reading the deprecation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Event.java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * @deprecated It is recommended that {@code AWTEvent}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subclasses
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * be used instead.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I get the impression they would read better without the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> redundant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "class" in the middle, like so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * @deprecated It is recommended that {@code AWTEvent}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subclasses
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * be used instead.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 30 September 2016 at 16:45, Sergey Bylokhov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review the fix for jdk9.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is request to deprecate the obsolete flags inside
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> InputEvent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This constants were marked as obsolete in jdk1.4 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> replaced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the new one. In jdk1.4 the documentation were update
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the new constants should be used. And this bug is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> official deprecation of them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can replace old constants by the new one in the whole
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jdk,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated only the code in InputEvent to make change
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> safer. So at least the new code in jdk and the code in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applications
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will start to use the new constants.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The changes in jconsole are necessary to fix deprecation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jprt build passed, no new issues were found by jck/jtreg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8143077
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8143077>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Webrev can be found at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8143077/webrev.00
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8143077/webrev.00>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, Sergey.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
More information about the swing-dev
mailing list