<Swing Dev> 8138771: java.awt.image.AbstractMultiResolutionImage needs customized spec for methods of Image which it implements

[Jim Graham]

Looks good.  +1

		...jim

On 10/30/16 11:53 PM, Avik Niyogi wrote:
> Hi All,
> Please review the proposed specification for JDK9 including inputs from reviewer reviews.
> *cr.openjdk.java.net/~aniyogi/8138771/webrev.05/* <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aniyogi/8138771/webrev.05/>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> With Regards,
> Avik Niyogi
>> On 28-Oct-2016, at 1:18 am, Jim Graham <james.graham at oracle.com <mailto:james.graham at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Avik,
>>
>> My suggestion about adding a word "the" was not taken and a couple of other changes were made to the @return
>> statements which are not optimal.  Let's reset and use the following @return statements for each of the methods (to
>> mirror the way these are described in the Image base class):
>>
>> getWidth() - @return the width of the base image, or -1 if the width is not yet known
>> getHeight() - @return the height of the base image, or -1 if the height is not yet known
>> getGraphics() - @return throws {@code UnsupportedOperationException}
>> getSource() - @return the image producer that produces the pixels for the base image
>> getProperty() - @return the value of the named property in the base image
>>
>> (It would also be nice if the blank lines were the same in all of the doc comments.  Some comments have a couple of
>> blank lines to separate the javadoc sections and others have no blank lines.  But, that doesn't affect correctness, it
>> is just an easthetic issue...)
>>
>> ...jim
>>
>> On 10/26/16 11:51 PM, Avik Niyogi wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Please review the proposed specification for JDK9 including inputs from reviewer reviews.
>>> *http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aniyogi/8138771/webrev.04/*
>>> Thank you in advance.
>>>
>>> With Regards,
>>> Avik Niyogi
>>>
>>>> On 27-Oct-2016, at 2:33 am, Jim Graham <james.graham at oracle.com <mailto:james.graham at oracle.com>
>>>> <mailto:james.graham at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The "@return" tags should not start with "returns" in the text.
>>>>
>>>> Also, in the @return for getProperty(), insert a word "the" as "the property of the base image"...
>>>>
>>>> ...jim
>>>>
>>>> On 10/26/16 12:36 AM, Avik Niyogi wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please review the proposed specification for JDK9 including inputs from reviver reviews.
>>>>>
>>>>> *cr.openjdk.java.net/~aniyogi/8138771/webrev.03/* <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aniyogi/8138771/webrev.03/*>
>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aniyogi/8138771/webrev.03/*>
>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aniyogi/8138771/webrev.03/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>> With Regards,
>>>>> Avik Niyogi
>>>
>