<Swing Dev> [9] Review request for 8154043: Fields not reachable anymore by tab-key, because of new tabbing behaviour of radio button groups.

Semyon Sadetsky semyon.sadetsky at oracle.com
Thu Sep 15 08:47:52 UTC 2016



On 14.09.2016 21:00, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
> On 9/14/2016 6:41 PM, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
>> On 9/14/2016 1:48 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please review fix for JDK9:
>>>
>>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154043
>>>
>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8154043/webrev/
>>>
>>> The new RadioButton group focus traversal algorithm introduced by 
>>> JDK-8033699 doesn't take into account that group of radio buttons 
>>> can be lay-outed in several lines in container. In this case the 
>>> LayoutFocusTraversalPolicy may mix radio buttons of the same group 
>>> with other components in its focus traversal order and break the 
>>> assumption used in 
>>> BasicRadioButtonUI#getFocusTransferBaseComponent() that radio 
>>> buttons are sequenced in the focus policy order.
>>>
>>> The fix propose to treat a group of toggle buttons as a single focus 
>>> cycle entry in the LayoutFocusTraversalPolicy which order is 
>>> determined by the first toggle button in the group.
>>   Should the test for the fix JDK-8033699 
>> test/javax/swing/JRadioButton/8033699/bug8033699.java be updated as 
>> well?
>   Is it possible to move the focus from the current radio button to 
> the next component which does not belong to the current radio buttons 
> group by pressing tab key?
>   For example in the test FocusCycleRootTest from the issue 
> description, moving the focus from the first and the second radio 
> button to the text field 1 and from the third and the fourth radio 
> button to the text field 2.
It is possible. But then the group will get focus second (or more) time 
during the cycle. Seems, this is not correct because option in the group 
has already been selected. Also it looks inconsistent when the second 
option is skipped in the cycle while the third is not.

--Semyon
>
>   Thanks,
>   Alexandr.
>>
>>   Thanks,
>>   Alexandr.
>>>
>>> --Semyon
>>>
>>>
>>
>




More information about the swing-dev mailing list