<Swing Dev> [9] Review Request: 8175266 Use package-info.java instead of package.html within swing packages

[Sergey Bylokhov]

Hello,
Please review the fix for jdk9.
 - All "package.html" files were replaced by "package-info.java" in javax.swing package and its subpackages.
 - All <tag> were replaced by {@tag }.
 - Some unnecessary <B> tags were removed.
 - I also wraped some references to the classes in the {@link}
 - All files were manually reformatted - 80 chars per line.

Later I will do the same for all other packages in java client.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175266
Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8175266/webrev.00/
Specdiff: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8175266/specdiff/overview-summary.html <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8175266/specdiff/overview-summary.html>

The same bug was fixed in awn already:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6622944 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6622944>
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2017-February/012610.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/attachments/20170220/26816c80/attachment.html>