<Swing Dev> [10][JDK-8187936] Automatically selecting a new JTree node in a model listener can cause unusual behavior.

Krishna Addepalli krishna.addepalli at oracle.com
Sat Nov 18 02:11:57 UTC 2017


Hi Phil,

 

I have attached the code for your reference. However, the problem is specifically in this function: 

 

            @Override
            public void treeNodesInserted(final TreeModelEvent event) {
                SwingUtilities.invokeLater(() -> {
                    final TreePath pathToLastInsertedChild =
                            event.getTreePath().pathByAddingChild(event.getChildren()[event.getChildren().length - 1]);
                    tree.setSelectionPath(pathToLastInsertedChild);
                });

//                final TreePath pathToLastInsertedChild =
//                        event.getTreePath().pathByAddingChild(event.getChildren()[event.getChildren().length - 1]);
//                tree.setSelectionPath(pathToLastInsertedChild);
            }

 

This is part of the TreeModelListener class, which receives callbacks for any changes to the underlying model of the tree - like insertion, deletion, structural changes etc. Now, the catch is even JTree has its own ModelListener which listens to changes so that it can adapt its GUI. 

In this case, the listeners seem to be called from last to first - meaning the application registered listener will be called first and then the components own ModelListener.

In the above function, the application (commented out code) tries to highlight the path to the newly inserted node, which JTree has not yet seen since its listener is not called yet. This leads to inconsistent UI rendering, since it would be trying to show some node which is not present.

For such cases, it is recommended to use "SwingUtilities.invokeLater", so that, the new UI event will be processed after JTree has had a chance to update itself to the changes in the model.

 

Here is the code that is calling the listeners (in DefaultTreeModel.java):

protected void fireTreeNodesInserted(Object source, Object[] path,
                                    int[] childIndices,
                                    Object[] children) {
    // Guaranteed to return a non-null array
    Object[] listeners = listenerList.getListenerList();
    TreeModelEvent e = null;
    // Process the listeners last to first, notifying
    // those that are interested in this event
    for (int i = listeners.length-2; i>=0; i-=2) {
        if (listeners[i]==TreeModelListener.class) {
            // Lazily create the event:
            if (e == null)
                e = new TreeModelEvent(source, path,
                                       childIndices, children);
            ((TreeModelListener)listeners[i+1]).treeNodesInserted(e);
        }
    }
}

 

 

Thanks,

Krishna

 

 

From: Phil Race 
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2017 3:29 AM
To: Krishna Addepalli <krishna.addepalli at oracle.com>; swing-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: <Swing Dev> [10][JDK-8187936] Automatically selecting a new JTree node in a model listener can cause unusual behavior.

 

Hi,

Whilst I could perhaps provide some very minor tweaks to the wording you
are adding, I would first like to understand the details of why the rendering
becomes broken here since there doesn't seem to be anything intrinsically
wrong - only the model is being updated.
I've found that commenting out one of the other listener methods
BasicTreeUI.Handler.treeNodesInserted - "cures" it.
So what we seem to be saying here, is that when you get notification
of a change in the model, you must not make further changes in the model
until any UI listener has processed the first change .. and throwing this
on the queue via invokeLater is the obvious way to do that.

But I've run out of time to look at quite where the rendering breaks
and I'm not sure if this is as general a problem as the new comment
would imply.

So can you say something about why we miss rendering some nodes
and quite why BasicTreeUI.Handler.treeNodesInserted is breaking it.

-phil.




On 11/12/2017 11:07 PM, Krishna Addepalli wrote:

Hi Sergey,

 

Gentle reminder. Could you review?

 

Thanks,

Krishna

 

From: Krishna Addepalli 
Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 8:22 PM
To: HYPERLINK "mailto:swing-dev at openjdk.java.net"swing-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: [10][JDK-8187936] Automatically selecting a new JTree node in a model listener can cause unusual behavior.

 

Hi Sergey,

Could you review this and let me know your feedback?

 

Thanks,

Krishna

 

From: Krishna Addepalli 
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 4:43 PM
To: HYPERLINK "mailto:swing-dev at openjdk.java.net"swing-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: [10][JDK-8187936] Automatically selecting a new JTree node in a model listener can cause unusual behavior.

 

Hi All,

Please review the help text that is updated for this bug:

 

Bug: JDK-8187936: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187936

 

Webrev: HYPERLINK "http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekaddepalli/8187936/webrev00/"http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kaddepalli/8187936/webrev00/

 

Summary:

As the bug title mentions, this is an unrecommended way of using the model listeners. The code posted in the bug tries to update the JTree path in the model listener callback, and since the JTree is yet to change itself to the underlying model, it results in weird UI behavior.

Attached code in the bug is corrected and re-uploaded. 

 

This typically happens since listeners are called in a particular order (either last to first or first to last in the order of registration), and if the model listener tries to change the GUI before the GUI has had a chance to react itself to the changes in the underlying model. For example, highlighting a selection path for a node added in the JTree, in the TreeModelListener callback could lead to an extra node being added or existing nodes not being shown, since JTree would not have yet updated its state based on the model changes.

 

In such cases it is recommended to wrap the callback function contents into a lambda, and invoke it through "SwingUtilities.invokeLater". This ensures that all the UI elements have had a chance to react to the model changes, and any UI actions will be guaranteed to operate on the updated widgets.

 

Similar update has been done in package-info.java for Swing, so that it acts as a reference.

 

Thanks,

Krishna

 

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/attachments/20171117/a84d0247/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: MinimalDemoFixed.java
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3180 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/attachments/20171117/a84d0247/MinimalDemoFixed.java>


More information about the swing-dev mailing list