<Swing Dev> [14] RFR JDK-7020860 - BasicTreeUI contains getters/setters with unclear spec

Phil Race philip.race at oracle.com
Wed Dec 11 18:44:17 UTC 2019


OK. +1. although Sergey should also approve this

-phil

On 12/4/19 1:32 AM, Tejpal Rebari wrote:
>
> Hi Phil,
>
>> On 27-Nov-2019, at 9:59 PM, Philip Race <philip.race at oracle.com 
>> <mailto:philip.race at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Yes it needs a CSR.
> Will raise a CSR once the review is done.
>> The updated wording explains when the "set*" methods are used/called 
>> but does not do the same for the get* methods. Why not for both ?
> The setters will be called when the property (like rowHeight, 
> cellRenderer etc.) changes in the drawn tree component.
> But the getters won’t be called when the property changes, so they 
> need not to be updated.
>
> Regards
> Tejpal
>
>> -phil.
>>
>> On 11/24/19, 11:31 PM, Jayathirth Rao wrote:
>>> Its looks okay.
>>> Lets wait for Sergey’s inputs on the same.
>>>
>>> And I think it needs CSR also.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jay
>>>
>>>> On 22-Nov-2019, at 3:04 PM, Tejpal Rebari <tejpal.rebari at oracle.com 
>>>> <mailto:tejpal.rebari at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jay,
>>>> I have appended the text instead of replacing it,
>>>> and also updated the SelectionModel methods.
>>>>
>>>> Please find the updated webrev  :
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~trebari/swing/7020860/webrev1/ 
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Etrebari/swing/7020860/webrev1/>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Tejpal
>>>>
>>>>> On 18-Nov-2019, at 1:00 PM, Jayathirth D V 
>>>>> <jayathirth.d.v at oracle.com <mailto:jayathirth.d.v at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Tejpal,
>>>>> I think Sergey has given more inputs on the present change that 
>>>>> you have at :
>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2016-October/006815.html
>>>>> andhttp://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2017-June/007495.html
>>>>> Apart from this changes are fine.
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Jay
>>>>> *From:*Tejpal Rebari
>>>>> *Sent:*Thursday, October 31, 2019 1:55 PM
>>>>> *To:*swing-dev at openjdk.java.net <mailto:swing-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>>>>> *Subject:*<Swing Dev> [14] RFR JDK-7020860 - BasicTreeUI contains 
>>>>> getters/setters with unclear spec
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>> Please review the following fix for JDK 14.
>>>>> Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7020860
>>>>> Webrev : 
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~trebari/swing/7020860/webrev0/ 
>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Etrebari/swing/7020860/webrev0/>
>>>>> Issue : Class javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTreeUI contains some 
>>>>> getters/setters that are not consistent and
>>>>> and have specification that says nothing about how they should be 
>>>>> used and how do they behave in BasicTreeUI.
>>>>> Fix : This bug was already sent for review by semyon 
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/7020860/webrev.00/ 
>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Essadetsky/7020860/webrev.00/>.
>>>>> I have made the following changes to the above webrev :
>>>>> * @param newValue the new value of the {@code editable}> property
>>>>> changed to —>>
>>>>> * @param newValue the new value of the {@code editable} property
>>>>> And
>>>>> * Returns whether the root node of the drawn tree component is 
>>>>> displayable.
>>>>> changed to —>>
>>>>> * Returns whether the root node of the drawn tree component should 
>>>>> be displayed.
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Tejpal
>>>>
>>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/attachments/20191211/981ef357/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the swing-dev mailing list