[threeten-dev] DateTimeFormatter.withLocale question

[Masayoshi Okutsu]

Ah, yes. Thank you for pointing it out.

Masayoshi

On 2/14/2013 4:26 AM, Naoto Sato wrote:
> On 2/12/13 9:16 PM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
>> On 2/13/2013 7:38 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>>> On 12 February 2013 22:34, Naoto Sato <naoto.sato at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2/12/13 8:05 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>>>>> DateFormat/SimpleDateFormat doesn't distinguish between the two
>>>>> AFAICT,
>>
>> Traditionally DateFormat/SimpleDateFormat does. You have to set its
>> NumberFormat to another one with a different numbering system, which is
>> actually similar to the current DateTimeFormat design.
>>
>> As Naoto pointed out, you can specify different setting with a Locale
>> value in JDK 8. For example, "en-u-ca-japanese-u-nu-thai" specifies to
>> use the Japanese calendar with English date-time format patterns using
>> the Thai digits (numbering system).
>
> Just a nitpicking :-)
>
> In this example, -u appears twice which is invalid (as a matter of 
> fact, JDK's impl just ignores the latter -u, instead of throwing an 
> exception), so in order to have the desired output, 
> "en-u-ca-japanese-nu-thai" is the right BCP47 notation.
>
> Naoto
>