[threeten-dev] Please help to review new test code for java.time.calendars.HijrahChronology
Patrick Zhang
patrick.zhang at oracle.com
Tue Jan 29 22:26:16 PST 2013
Hi Team,
Please help to review below new added test case:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pzhang/JSR310/java/time/calendars/HijrahChronology/test/java/time/tck/java/time/calendars/TestHijrahChronology.java.udiff.html
test result:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pzhang/JSR310/java/time/calendars/HijrahChronology/TestHijrahChronology.jtr
Description:
The new added test cases are used for prolepticYear() and isLeapYear().
1. As description of HijrahChronology, year 2,5,7,10,,13,16,18,21,24,26
and 29 will be leap years. So add test_isLeapYear() to check it. And for
leap year, date(prolepticYear, 12, 30) should be equal with
dateYearDay(prolepticYear, 355). For non-leap year, date(prolepticYear,
12, 29) should be equal with dateYearDay(prolepticYear, 354).
2. We can get below table from definition of HijrahChronology:
ISO prolepticYear 618
619
620
621
622
623
624
...
year of ERA_AH -2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
...
year of ERA_BEFORE_AH 3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
...
From above table, then we can get return value of prolepticYear():
prolepticYear(ERA_AH, a) = a;
prolepticYear(ERA_BEFORE_AH, a) + prolepticYear(ERA_AH, a) = 1; It
means prolepticYear(ERA_BEFORE_AH, a)= 1-a.
Above logic has been verified in test_prolepticYear()
Regards
Patrick
More information about the threeten-dev
mailing list