[threeten-dev] Please help to review new test code for java.time.calendars.JapaneseChronology

patrick zhang patrick.zhang at oracle.com
Wed Jan 30 01:34:06 PST 2013


The text of webrev/result link looks good. But it seems it points to 
incorrect url. Please copy it to browser then open it. Or click below 
updated link directly.

webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pzhang/JSR310/java/time/calendars/JapaneseChronology/

test result:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pzhang/JSR310/java/time/calendars/JapaneseChronology/TestJapaneseChronology.jtr

Regards
Patrick

On 2013-1-30 14:46, Patrick Zhang wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Please help to review below new added test case:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pzhang/JSR310/java/time/calendars/JapaneseChronology/test/java/time/tck/java/time/calendars/TestJapaneseChronology.java.udiff.html 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Epzhang/JSR310/java/time/calendars/HijrahChronology/test/java/time/tck/java/time/calendars/TestHijrahChronology.java.udiff.html>
>
> test result:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pzhang/JSR310/java/time/calendars/JapaneseChronology/TestJapaneseChronology.jtr 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Epzhang/JSR310/java/time/calendars/HijrahChronology/TestHijrahChronology.jtr>
>
> Description:
> The new added test cases are used for prolepticYear(), datYearDay and 
> isLeapYear().
> 1. As positive test case, some leapYear/02/29 are verified with 
> according ISO date. And as negative test case, some non-leapYear/02/29 
> are added in "badDates" data provider and it should throw 
> DateTimeException. And we use both dateYearDay(year, doy) and 
> date(era, year, month, dom) to construct same ISO date to confirm it 
> works well.
>
> 2. Since prolepticYear of JapaneseChronology is same with ISO calendar 
> system, then for all eras, we can confirm below formula should work:
>     prolepticYear(ear, a) = a + era_diff
>
> JapaneseChronology leap year is same with ISO leap year. Then we can 
> confirm isLeapYear(prolepticYear) should return same value with 
> Year.of(prolepticYear).isLeap() safely.
>
> Above logic has been verified in test_prolepticYear().
>      
> Regards
> Patrick


More information about the threeten-dev mailing list