[threeten-dev] Review for #304 change to encoding of BCP 47 calendar types

[Stephen Colebourne]

Looks good to me.
Stephen

On 1 May 2013 20:15, roger riggs <roger.riggs at oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following from the change of the proposal in CLDR [2] to keep the calendar
> type
> within the -ca- tag instead of introducing variants.
>
> Please review the change to bring java.time in alignment with the proposal
> and resolve issue #304.
>
> Webrev:
>    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-cldr-type-304/
>
> Thanks, Roger
>
> [1]
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/threeten-dev/2013-April/001235.html
> [2]
> http://cldr.unicode.org/development/development-process/design-proposals/islamic-calendar-types
> [3] https://github.com/ThreeTen/threeten/issues/304