From Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com Mon Jul 24 15:10:18 2017 From: Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com (Roger Riggs) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 11:10:18 -0400 Subject: [threeten-dev] Dissolving the threeten-dev project? Message-ID: <7a20b7e4-d754-8510-2afe-c5070c90f469@Oracle.com> Hi, I think the OpenJDK ThreeTen[1] project has outlived its usefulness since java.time has been integrated into the JDK. Are there anything I should take into consideration before formally calling for it to be dissolved? Thanks, Roger [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/threeten/ From scolebourne at joda.org Mon Jul 24 15:29:50 2017 From: scolebourne at joda.org (Stephen Colebourne) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:29:50 +0100 Subject: [threeten-dev] Dissolving the threeten-dev project? In-Reply-To: <7a20b7e4-d754-8510-2afe-c5070c90f469@Oracle.com> References: <7a20b7e4-d754-8510-2afe-c5070c90f469@Oracle.com> Message-ID: This seems like a good time to close it. Stephen On 24 July 2017 at 16:10, Roger Riggs wrote: > Hi, > > I think the OpenJDK ThreeTen[1] project has outlived its usefulness since > java.time has been integrated > into the JDK. Are there anything I should take into consideration before > formally calling for it > to be dissolved? > > Thanks, Roger > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/threeten/ From Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com Mon Jul 24 20:23:56 2017 From: Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com (Roger Riggs) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:23:56 -0400 Subject: [threeten-dev] CFV: Dissolving the ThreeTen project Message-ID: <1d949361-db22-cf04-7af6-1541d3ed9e0f@Oracle.com> I propose that the ThreeTen[3] project should be dissolved. The development of JSR 310 aka ThreeTen aka java.time has been integrated into OpenJDK development since JDK 1.8. According to section 6 of the bylaws[1], the Committers of a Project may decide, by Lazy Consensus[2], to request that a Project should be dissolved. When a Project is dissolved its materials are archived. A dissolved Project may be re-created by being re-proposed. Votes are due by: 7 August2017. Only current ThreeTen Committers[4] are eligible to vote. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. The current list of committers are: Committer rriggs Roger Riggs misterm Michael Nascimento Santos okutsu Masayoshi Okutsu pzhang Patrick Zhang rwarburton Richard Warburton scolebourne Stephen Colebourne sherman Xueming Shen For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. Thanks, Roger [1] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#_6 [2] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#lazy-consensus [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/threeten/ [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#threeten From scolebourne at joda.org Tue Jul 25 12:10:35 2017 From: scolebourne at joda.org (Stephen Colebourne) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:10:35 +0100 Subject: [threeten-dev] CFV: Dissolving the ThreeTen project In-Reply-To: <1d949361-db22-cf04-7af6-1541d3ed9e0f@Oracle.com> References: <1d949361-db22-cf04-7af6-1541d3ed9e0f@Oracle.com> Message-ID: +1 Stephen On 24 July 2017 at 21:23, Roger Riggs wrote: > I propose that the ThreeTen[3] project should be dissolved. The development > of JSR 310 aka > ThreeTen aka java.time has been integrated into OpenJDK development since > JDK 1.8. > > According to section 6 of the bylaws[1], the Committers of a Project may > decide, by Lazy Consensus[2], to request that a Project should be > dissolved. When a Project is dissolved its materials are archived. A > dissolved Project may be re-created by being re-proposed. > > Votes are due by: 7 August2017. > > Only current ThreeTen Committers[4] are eligible to vote. > Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. > > The current list of committers are: > > Committer > rriggs > Roger Riggs > misterm Michael Nascimento Santos > okutsu Masayoshi Okutsu > pzhang Patrick Zhang > rwarburton Richard Warburton > scolebourne Stephen Colebourne > sherman Xueming Shen > > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Thanks, Roger > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#_6 > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#lazy-consensus > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/threeten/ > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#threeten From Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com Tue Jul 25 14:40:51 2017 From: Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com (Roger Riggs) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:40:51 -0400 Subject: [threeten-dev] CFV: Dissolving the ThreeTen project In-Reply-To: <1d949361-db22-cf04-7af6-1541d3ed9e0f@Oracle.com> References: <1d949361-db22-cf04-7af6-1541d3ed9e0f@Oracle.com> Message-ID: <14ed2442-e549-bf10-e849-cf898aae8356@Oracle.com> Vote: yes On 7/24/2017 4:23 PM, Roger Riggs wrote: > I propose that the ThreeTen[3] project should be dissolved. The > development of JSR 310 aka > ThreeTen aka java.time has been integrated into OpenJDK development > since JDK 1.8. > > According to section 6 of the bylaws[1], the Committers of a Project may > decide, by Lazy Consensus[2], to request that a Project should be > dissolved. When a Project is dissolved its materials are archived. A > dissolved Project may be re-created by being re-proposed. > > Votes are due by: 7 August2017. > > Only current ThreeTen Committers[4] are eligible to vote. > Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. > > The current list of committers are: > > Committer > rriggs > Roger Riggs > misterm Michael Nascimento Santos > okutsu Masayoshi Okutsu > pzhang Patrick Zhang > rwarburton Richard Warburton > scolebourne Stephen Colebourne > sherman Xueming Shen > > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Thanks, Roger > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#_6 > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#lazy-consensus > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/threeten/ > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#threeten From xueming.shen at oracle.com Mon Jul 31 15:12:56 2017 From: xueming.shen at oracle.com (Xueming Shen) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 08:12:56 -0700 Subject: [threeten-dev] CFV: Dissolving the ThreeTen project In-Reply-To: <1d949361-db22-cf04-7af6-1541d3ed9e0f@Oracle.com> References: <1d949361-db22-cf04-7af6-1541d3ed9e0f@Oracle.com> Message-ID: <597F48F8.70107@oracle.com> Vote: yes On 7/24/17, 1:23 PM, Roger Riggs wrote: > I propose that the ThreeTen[3] project should be dissolved. The > development of JSR 310 aka > ThreeTen aka java.time has been integrated into OpenJDK development > since JDK 1.8. > > According to section 6 of the bylaws[1], the Committers of a Project may > decide, by Lazy Consensus[2], to request that a Project should be > dissolved. When a Project is dissolved its materials are archived. A > dissolved Project may be re-created by being re-proposed. > > Votes are due by: 7 August2017. > > Only current ThreeTen Committers[4] are eligible to vote. > Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. > > The current list of committers are: > > Committer > rriggs > Roger Riggs > misterm Michael Nascimento Santos > okutsu Masayoshi Okutsu > pzhang Patrick Zhang > rwarburton Richard Warburton > scolebourne Stephen Colebourne > sherman Xueming Shen > > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Thanks, Roger > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#_6 > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#lazy-consensus > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/threeten/ > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#threeten