[RFR] Cleanup and add lots of new tests
Jean Christophe Beyler
jcbeyler at google.com
Wed Jun 5 16:56:31 UTC 2019
Fair enough. I think it adds really nothing from a TSAN point of view and I
don't think it changes much. The only difference I really see is that the
second element of the array is initialized by the main thread but no one
touches that element.
I let you decide if you want to leave it; I think it does not really make
it more complex from a TSAN point of view :)
LGTM either way and I don't need a webrev even if you do update it,
Jc
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 9:02 AM Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks at google.com> wrote:
> Looks good to me; by curiosity, why do we allocate two elements for the
>> arrays?
>>
> I thought it'd be good if there was one element we accessed and one we
> didn't. It almost certainly doesn't add any test coverage, but I kind of
> liked that it was a little more complex than just a one element array.
>
--
Thanks,
Jc
More information about the tsan-dev
mailing list