RFR: Enable field access instrumentation for aarch64
eric.1iu
github.com+10482586+erik1iu at openjdk.java.net
Wed May 27 01:49:24 UTC 2020
On Tue, 26 May 2020 16:56:32 GMT, Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This patch enables field access instrumentation for aarch64.
>>
>> According to the implementation of x86, this patch inserts TSAN
>> functions in interpreter (templateTable_aarch64.cpp) at three places
>> which can cover all field accesses:
>>
>> 1. getfield_or_static
>> 2. putfield_or_static
>> 3. load_field_cp_cache_entry
>>
>> This patch implements the annotation
>> 'java.util.concurrent.annotation.LazyInit', which causes TSAN to ignore
>> races on that field. References that marked by @LazyInit are not simply
>> ignored, but a release/acquire is performed on them. This is so that any
>> following accesses to its member variables are not also reported as race.
>>
>> This patch also moves some architecture independent code into common
>> files.
>>
>> TODO:
>> - Array access instrumentation will be updated in later patch.
>>
>> [Tests]
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/tsan/RacyByteMemberLoopTest.java
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/tsan/RacyCharMemberLoopTest.java
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/tsan/RacyShortMemberLoopTest.java
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/tsan/RacyIntMemberLoopTest.java
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/tsan/RacyFloatMemberLoopTest.java
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/tsan/RacyLongMemberLoopTest.java
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/tsan/RacyDoubleMemberLoopTest.java
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/tsan/LazyInitLoopTest.java
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/tsan/LazyInitReferenceLoopTest.java
>>
>> With this patch, those test cases above passed on aarch64.
>> No new failure found on x86.
>
> src/hotspot/share/interpreter/templateTable.hpp line 335:
>
>> 334: static void def(Bytecodes::Code code, int flags, TosState in, TosState out, void (*gen)(int arg ), int
>> arg ); 335: static void def(Bytecodes::Code code, int flags, TosState in, TosState out, void (*gen)(bool arg
>> ), bool arg ); 336: static void def(Bytecodes::Code code, int flags, TosState in, TosState out, void
>> (*gen)(TosState tos), TosState tos);
>
> This seems unnecessary and can introduce potential merge conflicts
Agree.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/tsan/pull/11
More information about the tsan-dev
mailing list