Regression test failures in type-annotations langtools test set

Werner Dietl wdietl at gmail.com
Thu Aug 16 20:25:56 PDT 2012


Hi Steve,

thanks for the input!

I just pushed a set of changes that should fix bug 7172567 and the
three failing test cases.
The other 6 failing tests are on our plate and will get addressed soon.

My changes might have broken a few other test cases that we will
resolve soon. Please do let me know whether the build works.

Thanks again and looking forward to working with you.
cu, WMD.


On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Steve Sides <steve.sides at oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>  I am part of the java sqe group for langtools. We have been running nightly
> testing on type-annotations builds taken from the openjdk repository, and I
> have been seeing a few tests failures in the type-annotations/langtools/test
> set (a.k.a regression tests).
>
> Some of these are a result of missing target types (TYPE-USE and
> TYPE-PARAMETER) on type annotation declarations and  have a bug associated
> and are noted as such below.
> There are 9 failing tests in all. FWIW, the first 5 pass with jdk8 and
> lambda builds.
>
> Two javadoc tests:
> 1. com/sun/javadoc/testDeprecatedDocs/TestDeprecatedDocs.java
> 2. com/sun/javadoc/testNewLanguageFeatures/TestNewLanguageFeatures.java
>
> These do not use type annotations:
> 3. tools/javac/tree/TreePosTest.java
> 4. tools/javac/failover/CheckAttributedTree.java
>
> Not sure. :/  It is not a test of annotations but a test of diagnostics.
> 5. tools/javac/diags/CheckExamples.java
>
> 7172567 Missing @Target  on annotation:
> 6. tools/javac/T6985181.java
> 7. tools/javac/annotations/6881115/T6881115.java  //dianostic test with an
> extra error output due to a missing @Target
> 8. tools/javac/processing/model/element/TestAnonClassNames.java
>
> This test is not in jdk8 or lambda repositories, only type-annotations, and
> it is not a test of type annotations:
> 9. tools/javac/api/EndPositions.java
>
> cheers,
>
> -steve
>



-- 
http://www.google.com/profiles/wdietl


More information about the type-annotations-dev mailing list