test failures
Jonathan Gibbons
jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Thu Apr 25 07:41:35 PDT 2013
Yes, here are results from test runb this morning:
com/sun/javadoc/typeAnnotations/smoke/TestSmoke.java
tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/classfile/T8008762.java
tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/failures/CantAnnotateStaticClass.java
tools/javac/api/TestJavacTaskScanner.java
tools/javac/generics/6413682/TestPos.java
tools/javac/processing/model/type/BasicAnnoTests.java
-- Jon
On 04/24/2013 11:36 PM, Joel Borggrén-Franck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It builds for me.
>
> Also
>
>>> tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/classfile/T8008769.java
>>> tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/classfile/TestNewCastArray.java
> should be fine now.
>
> cheers
> /Joel
>
> On Apr 25, 2013, at 7:01 AM, Werner Dietl <wdietl at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Strange, for me type-annotations isn't building right now.
>> It looks like the merge of
>> src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/code/TypeAnnotations.java didn't
>> pull in the changes that happened in jdk8/tl.
>> Is my local repo inconsistent?
>> cu, WMD.
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Jonathan Gibbons
>> <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> I've done a build of the latest bits, and I'm seeing 8 failures: is that the
>>> expected state of play?
>>>
>>> com/sun/javadoc/typeAnnotations/smoke/TestSmoke.java
>>> tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/classfile/T8008762.java
>>> tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/classfile/T8008769.java
>>> tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/classfile/TestNewCastArray.java
>>> tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/failures/CantAnnotateStaticClass.java
>>> tools/javac/api/TestJavacTaskScanner.java
>>> tools/javac/generics/6413682/TestPos.java
>>> tools/javac/processing/model/type/BasicAnnoTests.java
>>>
>>> The problem with TestJavacTaskScanner.java may have been "imported" from
>>> current TL -- I think the Lambda folk broke it.
>>>
>>> javadoc is believed done, so TestSmoke should be investigated.
>>>
>>> The generics test is mostly OK -- the failure is a white-space change, so
>>> someone has messed with generating a string.
>>>
>>> -- Jon
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.google.com/profiles/wdietl
More information about the type-annotations-dev
mailing list