type-annotations/jdk

Werner Dietl wdietl at gmail.com
Mon Dec 16 13:36:06 PST 2013


Hi Steve,

> We continue to run nightly testing on the type-annotations repository.

Great! I've just synced the type-annotations repositories against tl.


> There are a couple failures
> tools/javac/processing/model/type/BasicAnnoTests.java

See the error report for this and the response in this thread:

http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-December/001453.html

As this won't be fixed until an 8u release, I've @ignored the test.


> tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/referenceinfos/Lambda.java

This failure was fixed thanks to Vicente's recent work.


> I think these are known. If not, let me know and I'll further describe
> what we're seeing.
> 
> The type-annotations/jdk repository appears to need some updating. We
> also run nightly tests for <forest>/jdk/test/tools.
> There are failures for tests that do not exist in jdk8/tl/jdk and some
> tests may be different. For jdk8/tl/jdk there are 0 failures.
> Can you check if the type-annotations/jdk repo needs updating?

I did a comparison between type-annotations/jdk and tl/jdk and, besides
the .hgtags, there are only two differences. I think the
type-annotations version is nicer for them:

jdk/src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Field.java indentation fixed

jdk/src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Modifier.java spelling fixed

Please do let me know if you still see type-annotations/jdk failures
that are unexpected.

Cheers,
cu, WMD.


More information about the type-annotations-dev mailing list