type-annotations/jdk
Werner Dietl
wdietl at gmail.com
Mon Dec 16 13:36:06 PST 2013
Hi Steve,
> We continue to run nightly testing on the type-annotations repository.
Great! I've just synced the type-annotations repositories against tl.
> There are a couple failures
> tools/javac/processing/model/type/BasicAnnoTests.java
See the error report for this and the response in this thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-December/001453.html
As this won't be fixed until an 8u release, I've @ignored the test.
> tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/referenceinfos/Lambda.java
This failure was fixed thanks to Vicente's recent work.
> I think these are known. If not, let me know and I'll further describe
> what we're seeing.
>
> The type-annotations/jdk repository appears to need some updating. We
> also run nightly tests for <forest>/jdk/test/tools.
> There are failures for tests that do not exist in jdk8/tl/jdk and some
> tests may be different. For jdk8/tl/jdk there are 0 failures.
> Can you check if the type-annotations/jdk repo needs updating?
I did a comparison between type-annotations/jdk and tl/jdk and, besides
the .hgtags, there are only two differences. I think the
type-annotations version is nicer for them:
jdk/src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Field.java indentation fixed
jdk/src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Modifier.java spelling fixed
Please do let me know if you still see type-annotations/jdk failures
that are unexpected.
Cheers,
cu, WMD.
More information about the type-annotations-dev
mailing list