Annotations on anonymous classes

[Steve Sides]

On 2/17/2013 8:50 PM, Werner Dietl wrote:
> I finished implementing the changed handling for anonymous classes, as
> described by Alex in:
>
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-spec-experts/2013-February/000063.html
>
> Steve/SQE: I only added one simple test to newlocations:
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/type-annotations/type-annotations/langtools/file/dbef4179abd8/test/tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/newlocations/AnonymousClass.java
>
> I tested that the annotations end up in the right locations using javap.
> None of the existing test styles seemed suitable to test for
> annotations on an anonymous class.
>
> Please do expand the tests and let me know if you see any issues with this.
>
> cu, WMD.
>
There are some in CombinationsTargetTest1.java (case4), but they are 
currently @ignore'd.
I have a webrev posted for tl/langtools which cleans up these tests so 
they will be run and not ignored.
It factors the failing cases out of test 1 so it runs completely. If 
filters the failing cases out of test2 (too many to factor out).

I recently added a couple more test cases to Combinations*2.java 
covering fields and methods.
I had posted some at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssides/tests/ 
(TestAnonInner*.java), but they were not posted as webrevs. :/
Last week, I incorporated them into one of the Combinations tests 
Friday, but it would be smoother if the aforementioned webrev were push 
first.

-steve