javadoc: not finding sym.type set

[Werner Dietl]

Jon,

this problem should be fixed in type-annotations/langtools.
Please do let me know if the behavior for this is now as expected.

cu, WMD.

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
<jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com> wrote:
> Werner,
>
> I've hooked my fancy new debugging printer into javadoc, to analyse how
> javadoc is processing a simple test program ...
>
> public class Test {
>     public @DAnno @TAnno int field;
> }
>
> The output shows that the symbol for "int field;" appears to be correctly
> annotated, but the "sym.type" field is not.  I would expect the type to be
> an AnnotatedType, with annos set to "@TAnno" and an underlying type of
> "int".  Here is the debug output.
>
> Generating play/api/p/Test.html...
> FieldDocImpl sym : 0x4--VAR FIELD field
>   flags: 0x1--public
>   completer: #null
>   owner: p.Test
>   type: int
>   erasure: #null
>   pos: 198
>   adm: -1
>   data: #null
>   annotations:
>     attributes: [1]
>       0: Compound
>         synthesized: false
>         values: [0]
>         type: q.DAnno
>     type_attributes: [1]
>       0: TypeCompound
>         position: [FIELD, pos = 198]
>         synthesized: false
>         values: [0]
>         type: q.TAnno
> FieldDocImpl sym.type : INT
>   tsym: int
>   constValue: #null
>
> I'm hoping the output is reasonably self-explanatory.  "FieldDocImpl" is the
> name of the javadoc class initiating the debug print.
>
> So, am I right in expecting the type to be "@TAnno int"?  Do you have any
> idea why it might not be so?
>
> -- Jon



-- 
http://www.google.com/profiles/wdietl