Clarification on type use

[Eric McCorkle]

The following is exerpted from the test
langtools/test/tools/javac/annotations/typeAnnotations/TypeUseTarget.java:

@A
class TypeUseTarget<K extends @A Object> {
...
}

@Target(ElementType.TYPE_USE)
@interface A { }


The first use of A seems to be on the class TypeUseTarget.  The result
with the current implementation is that javac produces a
RuntimeInvisibleAnnotations attribute for the class TypeUseTarget.

But is this valid?  I can't seem to find anything in the type
annotations spec that suggests that an annotation with a TYPE_USE target
can wind up being a regular annotation on a class (or interface).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: eric_mccorkle.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 303 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/attachments/20140403/d3d3b09f/eric_mccorkle-0001.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 901 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/attachments/20140403/d3d3b09f/signature-0001.asc>