Changes in type-annotations repository
Werner Dietl
wdietl at gmail.com
Tue Mar 4 10:09:13 PST 2014
The spec-observers list had a discussion whether the current behavior
for post-identifier array annotations is correct:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-spec-observers/2014-March/000267.html
I expanded the test cases to document the current behavior:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/type-annotations/type-annotations/langtools/rev/792c10e66b63
At the moment it sounds like the current behavior is correct; either
way, we now test this situation.
Also note that a recent refactoring broke two test cases that are
@ignored in trunk, but shouldn't be (see my earlier messages about the
differences between type-annotations and trunk).
This changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/type-annotations/type-annotations/langtools/rev/36b65df33194
adapts those test cases.
cu, WMD.
--
http://www.google.com/profiles/wdietl
More information about the type-annotations-dev
mailing list