Future of 'type-annotations/type-annotations' forest

[Eric McCorkle]

On 05/08/14 17:13, Werner Dietl wrote:
> 
> It was your "cleanup" changeset that broke this.
> I think the correct thing to do would have been to either roll back
> your broken changeset or apply my fix.
> 

Again, the rules for the langtools repository require that all patches
be accompanied by a test, unless the accompanying JBS issue has one of
the "noreg-" tags.

These noreg- tags are only allowed in a very small number of cases.  One
of these is for "cleanup" patches (indicated by "noreg-cleanup"), which
are explicitly *not* supposed to introduce any behavior changes.
However, accidents do happen, and in this case, one did.

The fix for this accident clearly intends to change the behavior of
javac, and thus, it must be accompanied by a test in order to be
integrated into the jdk9 forest.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: eric_mccorkle.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 314 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/attachments/20140508/07bd878c/eric_mccorkle.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 901 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/attachments/20140508/07bd878c/signature.asc>