bug in "8183130: [MVT] Implement intrinsics for Q-typed LambdaForms"?
Maurizio Cimadamore
maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com
Thu Jul 6 11:54:16 UTC 2017
I've been able to reproduce and fix - see RFR for JDK-8183929
Cheers
Maurizio
On 06/07/17 10:45, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
> I'll take a look
>
> Maurizio
>
>
> On 06/07/17 10:30, Roland Westrelin wrote:
>> The simple test below passes with the revision right before 8183130 and
>> fails (detects incorrect result) with 8183130. It passes again if I
>> change:
>>
>> vt.verify(test94_bool ? test94_vt1 : test94_vt2);
>>
>> to:
>>
>> vt.verify(test94_bool ? test94_vt2 : test94_vt1);
>>
>> which is obviously incorrect.
>>
>> Roland.
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/test/compiler/valhalla/valuetypes/ValueTypeTestBench.java
>> b/test/compiler/valhalla/valuetypes/ValueTypeTestBench.java
>> --- a/test/compiler/valhalla/valuetypes/ValueTypeTestBench.java
>> +++ b/test/compiler/valhalla/valuetypes/ValueTypeTestBench.java
>> @@ -2422,6 +2422,14 @@
>> MethodType test86_mt =
>> MethodType.fromMethodDescriptorString("(Qcompiler/valhalla/valuetypes/MyValue1;)I",
>> ValueTypeTestBench.class.getClassLoader());
>> test86_mh =
>> lookup.findVirtual(ValueTypeTestBench.class, "test86_target",
>> test86_mt);
>> +
>> + MethodType test94_mt =
>> MethodType.fromMethodDescriptorString("()Qcompiler/valhalla/valuetypes/MyValue3;",
>> ValueTypeTestBench.class.getClassLoader());
>> + MethodHandle test94_mh1 =
>> lookup.findVirtual(ValueTypeTestBench.class, "test94_target1",
>> test94_mt);
>> + MethodHandle test94_mh2 =
>> lookup.findVirtual(ValueTypeTestBench.class, "test94_target2",
>> test94_mt);
>> + MethodType test94_mt2 =
>> MethodType.methodType(boolean.class);
>> + MethodHandle test94_mh_test =
>> lookup.findVirtual(ValueTypeTestBench.class, "test94_test", test94_mt2);
>> + test94_mh = MethodHandles.guardWithTest(test94_mh_test,
>> test94_mh1, test94_mh2);
>> +
>> } catch (NoSuchMethodException|IllegalAccessException e) {
>> throw new RuntimeException("method handle lookup fails");
>> }
>> @@ -2605,6 +2613,40 @@
>> Asserts.assertEQ(result, 0L);
>> }
>> + // method handle combinators
>> + final MyValue3 test94_vt1 = MyValue3.create();
>> + @ForceInline
>> + MyValue3 test94_target1() {
>> + return test94_vt1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + final MyValue3 test94_vt2 = MyValue3.create();
>> + @ForceInline
>> + MyValue3 test94_target2() {
>> + return test94_vt2;
>> + }
>> +
>> + boolean test94_bool = true;
>> + @ForceInline
>> + boolean test94_test() {
>> + return test94_bool;
>> + }
>> +
>> + static final MethodHandle test94_mh;
>> +
>> + @Test
>> + MyValue3 test94() throws Throwable {
>> + return (MyValue3)test94_mh.invokeExact(this);
>> + }
>> +
>> + @DontCompile
>> + public void test94_verifier(boolean warmup) throws Throwable {
>> + test94_bool = !test94_bool;
>> + MyValue3 vt = test94();
>> + vt.verify(test94_bool ? test94_vt1 : test94_vt2);
>> + }
>> +
>> +
>> // ========== Test infrastructure ==========
>> private static final WhiteBox WHITE_BOX =
>> WhiteBox.getWhiteBox();
>> @@ -2679,7 +2721,7 @@
>> }
>> public static void main(String[] args) throws Throwable {
>> - //tests.values().removeIf(p ->
>> !p.getName().equals("test85")); // Run single test
>> + tests.values().removeIf(p -> !p.getName().equals("test94"));
>> // Run single test
>> if (args.length == 0) {
>> execute_vm("-XX:+IgnoreUnrecognizedVMOptions",
>> "-XX:-BackgroundCompilation",
>> "-XX:+PrintCompilation", "-XX:+PrintInlining",
>> "-XX:+PrintIdeal", "-XX:+PrintOptoAssembly",
>
More information about the valhalla-dev
mailing list