lworld regressions: parameterized q-type

[Srikanth]

Hi Remi,

I will take a look and follow up suitably.

Thanks
Srikanth

On 03/01/19 8:33 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
> Hi al,
> parameterized q-type are not erased correctly.
>
> Option.java:
>    this class compiles but the Q-type is not erased correctly
>    https://github.com/forax/valuetype-lworld/blob/master/src/main/java/fr.umlv.valuetype/fr/umlv/valuetype/Option.java
>
> java.lang.ClassFormatError: Illegal class name "Qfr/umlv/valuetype/Option<TE;>;" in class file fr/umlv/valuetype/Option
> 	at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
> 	at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:1016)
> 	at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:1095)
> 	at java.base/java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:183)
> 	at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.defineClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:761)
> 	at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.findClassInModuleOrNull(BuiltinClassLoader.java:682)
> 	at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClassOrNull(BuiltinClassLoader.java:607)
> 	at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:581)
> 	at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:178)
> 	at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:521)
> 	at fr.umlv.valuetype at 1.0/fr.umlv.valuetype.perf.OptionBenchMark.sum_option(OptionBenchMark.java:64)
> 	at fr.umlv.valuetype at 1.0/fr.umlv.valuetype.perf.generated.OptionBenchMark_sum_option_jmhTest.sum_option_avgt_jmhStub(OptionBenchMark_sum_option_jmhTest.java:190)
>
> Rémi
>
>