RFR 8223350(S): Use 'inline' classes instead of 'value' classes

John Rose john.r.rose at oracle.com
Thu May 9 20:15:43 UTC 2019

Previous message (by thread): RFR 8223350(S): Use 'inline' classes instead of 'value' classes
Next message (by thread): hg: valhalla/valhalla: 8223017: [lworld] checkcast/instance broken for LW2 arrays
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

We have some careful terminology decisions to make
about primary/secondary/class/type/nullable/indirect/inline.

I put a lengthy note on JDK-8223351 giving suggestions.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223351

— John

Previous message (by thread): RFR 8223350(S): Use 'inline' classes instead of 'value' classes
Next message (by thread): hg: valhalla/valhalla: 8223017: [lworld] checkcast/instance broken for LW2 arrays
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the valhalla-dev mailing list