for review: 8236522: "always atomic" modifier for inline classes to enforce atomicity

[Tobias Hartmann]

Hi John,

On 13.01.20 22:05, John Rose wrote:
> P.S. The bigger question, which I am not qualified to answer,
> is, “where should the store-store barrier be introduced?”
> I just found a likely spot which fixed a bug.  There could
> well be similar bugs in the woodwork which have not jumped
> 0ut yet, which would be fixed by careful rethink of the
> heap-buffering paths.

Right, could you please file a follow-up bug for that?
I'll take a closer look once your changes are in.

Thanks,
Tobias