RFR: addressing several issues in the implementation of universal tvars [v9]
Vicente Romero
vromero at openjdk.java.net
Wed Jun 8 19:14:51 UTC 2022
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 18:37:46 GMT, Vicente Romero <vromero at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> test/langtools/tools/javac/valhalla/lworld-values/universal-type-variables/UniversalTVarsCompilationTests.java line 671:
>>
>>> 669: T.ref field;
>>> 670: void foo(T t, Consumer<? super T> action) {
>>> 671: action.accept(field = t);
>>
>> Why does this fail? Aren't the two types identical (modulo ref/val) ?
>
> well action is parameterized with a wildcard so here we are assigning a ref to a wildcard, `field = t` is not failing though that assignment generates a warning
it could probably be better to write the test as:
field = t;
action.accept(field = t);
what do you think?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/valhalla/pull/684
More information about the valhalla-dev
mailing list