RFR: 8310905: [lw5] addressing review comments on null restricted types [v5]
Maurizio Cimadamore
mcimadamore at openjdk.org
Thu Jul 13 16:27:28 UTC 2023
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 21:57:46 GMT, Vicente Romero <vromero at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> addressing some review comments related to PR [1]
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/pull/872
>
> Vicente Romero has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> addressing another round of review comments
src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/code/Types.java line 1288:
> 1286: @Override
> 1287: public Boolean visitType(Type t, Type s) {
> 1288: Warner warner = !warnStack.isEmpty() ? warnStack.head : noWarnings;
Good cleanup. I assume that now nullability comparator really has no state, so you could in principle create two instances (with the two comparator functions), and just use those instances, right?
src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/comp/Check.java line 4490:
> 4488: case UNCHECKED:
> 4489: Check.this.warnUnchecked(pos(), Warnings.ProbFoundReq(diags.fragment(uncheckedKey), found, expected));
> 4490: this.warned = true;
Odd - this field is clearly meant to be set in this method, but it is not in mainline. Maybe better to set the field only once, after the switch?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/880#discussion_r1262786970
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/880#discussion_r1262792902
More information about the valhalla-dev
mailing list