[lworld] RFR: 8366717: [lworld] Cleanup defensive fixing of JDK-8365996
Tobias Hartmann
thartmann at openjdk.org
Fri Dec 19 08:23:25 UTC 2025
On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:26:03 GMT, Marc Chevalier <mchevalier at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Let's proceed piece by piece.
>
> # `G1BarrierSetAssembler::g1_write_barrier_pre` in `g1BarrierSetAssembler_aarch64.cpp`
>
> https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/blob/1077e4f9f06336af30d95fc28cbab4d31c9f2a44/src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/gc/g1/g1BarrierSetAssembler_aarch64.cpp#L216-L220
>
> `push_call_clobbered_registers`/`pop_call_clobbered_registers` should be enough around a runtime call, that's what clobbered registers are.
>
> But let's dig a bit, that will be useful later!
>
>
> push_call_clobbered_registers()
> => push_call_clobbered_registers_except(exclude = empty set)
> => push(call_clobbered_gp_registers() - exclude, sp) // with exclude = empty set
>
> So, we save at least `call_clobbered_gp_registers` which is defined as:
>
> https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/blob/1077e4f9f06336af30d95fc28cbab4d31c9f2a44/src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/macroAssembler_aarch64.cpp#L3614-L3620
>
> So, we save r0-r7 and r10-r17
>
> # `CardTableBarrierSetAssembler::oop_store_at` in `cardTableBarrierSetAssembler_aarch64.cpp`
>
> https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/blob/1077e4f9f06336af30d95fc28cbab4d31c9f2a44/src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/gc/shared/cardTableBarrierSetAssembler_aarch64.cpp#L116-L124
>
> Digging the history looks like it still makes sense, it doesn't look like an accident. If we remove the if-branch, tests are totally on fire. Let's keep it.
>
> # `CardTableBarrierSetAssembler::oop_store_at` in `cardTableBarrierSetAssembler_x86.cpp`
>
> Same as before. But it's not even guarantee that `InlineTypePassFieldsAsArgs` is true. We can have such a backtrace:
>
> CardTableBarrierSetAssembler::oop_store_at (cardTableBarrierSetAssembler_x86.cpp:184)
> CardTableBarrierSetAssembler::store_at (cardTableBarrierSetAssembler_x86.cpp:90)
> MacroAssembler::store_heap_oop (macroAssembler_x86.cpp:5515)
> do_oop_store (templateTable_x86.cpp:148)
> (called, for instance, from TemplateTable::putfield_or_static_helper (templateTable_x86.cpp:2964))
>
> where the last give `r8` for `tmp3`. It is not quite clear to me why we don't have a problem in mainline, because it looks like corrupting address base register is a bad idea given that we use it after.
>
> # `MacroAssembler::unpack_inline_helper` in `macroAssembler_aarch64.cpp`
>
> ## First part
> https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/blob/1077e4f9f06336af30d95fc28cbab4d31c9f2a44/src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/macroAssembler_aarch64.cpp#L7163-L7166
>
> Yes, these registers are saved, as we saw above! I've added some asserts to make sure that they are still in the `call_clobbered_gp_registers()` set. But it seems a bit ...
Thanks for the detailed analysis Marc! Changes look good to me, I just added a few comments.
src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/gc/shared/cardTableBarrierSetAssembler_aarch64.cpp line 117:
> 115: if (!precise || (dst.index() == noreg && dst.offset() == 0)) {
> 116: if (tmp3 != noreg) {
> 117: // When tmp3 is given, we cannot corrupt the dst.base() register (from MacroAssembler::pack_inline_helper or do_oop_store)
> it doesn't look like an accident. If we remove the if-branch, tests are totally on fire. Let's keep it.
It's only the `__ mov(tmp3, dst.base());` that could potentially be removed, right? Not the entire branch. If the `mov` is still needed, should it be guarded by `InlineTypePassFieldsAsArgs`?
src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/macroAssembler_aarch64.cpp line 7172:
> 7170: assert(clobbered_gp_regs.contains(tmp1), "tmp1 must be saved explicitly if it's not a clobber");
> 7171: assert(clobbered_gp_regs.contains(tmp2), "tmp2 must be saved explicitly if it's not a clobber");
> 7172: assert(clobbered_gp_regs.contains(r14), "r14 must be saved explicitly if it's not a clobber");
Great idea with these asserts!
src/hotspot/cpu/x86/gc/g1/g1BarrierSetAssembler_x86.cpp line 241:
> 239: // Barriers might be emitted when converting between (scalarized) calling conventions for inline
> 240: // types. Save all argument registers before calling into the runtime.
> 241: __ push_call_clobbered_registers();
I think this comment should just be reverted to the mainline state because it's not specific to the scalarized calling convention.
-------------
Marked as reviewed by thartmann (Committer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1824#pullrequestreview-3597477751
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1824#discussion_r2634139562
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1824#discussion_r2634140381
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1824#discussion_r2634137724
More information about the valhalla-dev
mailing list