[lworld] RFR: 8372824: [lworld] C2 hits "Unexpected argument type" assertion with --enable-preview [v4]

[Quan Anh Mai]

On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 15:43:31 GMT, Quan Anh Mai <qamai at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Since I overrode `MyValue1::equals` in #1929 , `TestIntrinsics` has failed with `-XX:PerMethodSpecTrapLimit=0 -XX:PerMethodTrapLimit=0`. The failed test is this one:
>> 
>>     // Value class array creation via reflection
>>     @Test
>>     public void test51(int len) {
>>         Object[] va = (Object[])Array.newInstance(MyValue1.class, len);
>>         for (int i = 0; i < len; ++i) {
>>             Asserts.assertEQ(va[i], null);
>>         }
>>     }
>> 
>> During parsing, `Array::newInstance` is not inlined, so `va` is of type `Object[]` and `va[i]` is of type `Object`. `Asserts.assertEQ` calls `va[i].equals(null)` which resolves to a `CallJavaDynamic` with its receiver of type `Object`, which is passed in as an oop. During incremental inline, It is revealed that `va` is a `MyValue1[]` and `va[i]` is of type `MyValue1`. This allows the devirtualization of `va[i]::equals`. Since this is a method call on a value object, the calling convention changes, which leads to the assert because the input is an oop.
>> 
>> I relaxed the assert a little bit to allow changing of the calling convention due to devirtualization.
>> 
>> Please take a look and leave your review, thansk a lot.
>
> Quan Anh Mai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   assert that we are during devirtualization of calls

Thanks very much for your approval!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1935#issuecomment-3782394090