[lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4]

[Joel Sikström]

> Hello,
> 
> We should be explicit when naming variables that refer to "fields" and state whether we mean staitc or nonstatic fields.
> 
> I've also done a bit of cleanup in `FieldLayoutBuilder::compute_inline_class_layout()`, which calls `has_nonstatic_fields`. The "has_nonstatic_fields" property is inherited from the superklass whenever a klass instance is created, so we only have to check the property once on the "first" superklass.
> 
> Testing:
> * Oracle's tier1-3, jdk_valhalla and hotspot_valhalla
> * I added an assert to sanity test that the while loop I removed in `FieldLayoutBuilder::compute_inline_class_layout()` never gets past the "first" superklass, which didn't hit in tier1-3.

Joel Sikström has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:

  Renamed closest_non_static to closest_nonstatic

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1992/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1992/files/02b416b3..3da3c2db

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=valhalla&pr=1992&range=03
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=valhalla&pr=1992&range=02-03

  Stats: 3 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1992.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1992/head:pull/1992

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1992