[External] Foo / Foo.ref is a backward default; should be Foo.val / Foo
Brian Goetz
brian.goetz at oracle.com
Mon Apr 25 19:56:51 UTC 2022
I think this is one of the areas where opinions are going to differ, because there is not necessarily a unitary notion of “the user”. In a small program were one person wrote all the code, I agree that minimizing intrusion will make that person happy. But Java’s strength is that it makes good *libraries* easy to write, and surely Valhalla will enable new numerical libraries. In which case there are TWO users, the one who wrote the library, and the one using it, and they are communicating through a thin pipe. This is where intent can be lost, and being a “libraries guy”, I think this is where Kevin is coming from.
On Apr 25, 2022, at 1:53 PM, Dan Heidinga <heidinga at redhat.com<mailto:heidinga at redhat.com>> wrote:
If a user has picked B2
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/valhalla-spec-experts/attachments/20220425/01c109f1/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the valhalla-spec-experts
mailing list