hg push getting worse?
Tim Bell
Tim.Bell at Sun.COM
Thu Aug 13 13:33:23 PDT 2009
I wrote:
> ZFS snapshots are supposed to be lightweight and inexpensive. We
> still have them going back to the beginning of time on hg.ojn.
>
> Perhaps we have accumulated enough to expose quadratic (or worse)
> performance problems. I will do some searching over on OpenSolaris.
I spent ten or fifteen minutes searching on this issue. The short
version is that there has been a significant amount of ZFS
performance work done since
"Solaris Express Developer Edition 9/07 snv_70a X86"
which is the release hg.ojn is running. That was the best choice
back when we set the server up, but now it is pretty old.
Here are a few examples - all of these are marked FIXed in builds
more recent than 70a. (FYI: OpenSolaris is currently up around b121):
6596190 ""zfs list" is slow due to version property"
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6596190
6386929 "initial "zfs list" is slow"
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6386929
6755389 "Initial run of any zfs command that iterates over datasets can be slow"
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6755389
Here is a message thread related to 'zfs list' being slow:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2008-July/019956.html
hg.ojn has been extremely stable since we set it up - it currently
has 652 days of uptime. All the same, it it probably time to start
planning an upgrade.
Tim
More information about the web-discuss
mailing list