Fwd: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :)
Ulf Zibis
Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de
Sat Jul 23 13:19:55 PDT 2011
Hi,
couldn't you use ReflectiveOperationException instead?
Additionally you could better profit from generics:
public static synchronized RenderingEngine getInstance() {
if (reImpl == null) {
reImpl = AccessController.doPrivileged(
new PrivilegedAction<RenderingEngine>() {
public RenderingEngine run() {
String reClass = System.getProperty("sun.java2d.renderer");
if ("sun.dc.DuctusRenderingEngine".equals(reClass)) {
try {
return (RenderingEngine)Class.forName(reClass).newInstance();
} catch (ReflectiveOperationException ignored) {
} // not found
}
for (RenderingEngine re : ServiceLoader.loadInstalled(
RenderingEngine.class)) {
if (re.getClass().getName().equals(reClass)) {
return re;
}
}
return null;
}
});
if (reImpl == null) {
throw new InternalError("No RenderingEngine module found");
}
if(AccessController.doPrivileged(new GetPropertyAction(
"sun.java2d.renderer.trace")) != null) {
reImpl = new Tracer(reImpl);
}
}
return reImpl;
}
And again more simple just use (no need for try...catch):
public RenderingEngine run() {
String reClass = System.getProperty("sun.java2d.renderer");
if ("sun.dc.DuctusRenderingEngine".equals(reClass)) {
return new sun.dc.DuctusRenderingEngine();
}
for (RenderingEngine re : ServiceLoader.loadInstalled(
RenderingEngine.class)) {
if (re.getClass().getName().equals(reClass)) {
return re;
}
}
return null;
}
-Ulf
Am 23.07.2011 18:16, schrieb Phil Race:
> Apparently bugs.openjdk.java.net hasn't heard of JDK 8
>
> -phil.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Small patch for multi-catch :)
> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:35:27 +0200
> From: Mario Torre <neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com>
> To: Phil Race <philip.race at oracle.com>
> CC: 2d-dev at openjdk.java.net
>
>
>
> 2011/7/23 Phil Race<philip.race at oracle.com>:
>> Looks OK .. you'll need to generate yourself a bug id.
>>
>> -phil.
>>
>
> Hello Phil,
>
> Thanks for the quick answer. I filed a new bug report, the ID is 100195:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100195
>
> I could not set the target release as JDK8, though.
>
> Cheers,
> Mario
More information about the web-discuss
mailing list